Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Do you think Hillary should run again in 2020? [View all]LisaM
(29,496 posts)177. No, even though I strongly supported her in both 2008 and 2016.
What more does she have to give us? The haters won't go away. She'll also be 72, and while I don't want to be an ageist, I think we need someone younger. But not too young! As I've stated before, I'd like someone to be President who remembers what it was like when girls weren't allowed to wear pants to school. Someone who's about Obama's age would be perfect for my demographic.
I do think it's essential that we get a woman president. The time is ripe. I'm encouraged by the number of women that are signing up to run for office. Do I think Hillary's sex was one of the many factors that cost us the election? Absolutely.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
188 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, it does not need to be a woman. I'd be fine with a woman, but it does NOT
beaglelover
Feb 2017
#121
No. Hillary can take comfort in knowing that she actually won. The repugs stole it.
brush
Feb 2017
#73
She's not running again but it is not accurate to say that she lost twice. She lost a historically
StevieM
Feb 2017
#135
She lost and she lost. If it was less close, she would have won. I understand what you are saying
adigal
Feb 2017
#167
I think Elizabeth Warren aligns with Bernie but doesn't have the icky "socialist" label
agenasolva
Feb 2017
#11
Warren has become polarizing due to the GOP, she's in danger of losing her senate seat...
NotThisTime
Feb 2017
#77
Warren is not in danger of losing her Senate seat, she will win in a landslide.
StevieM
Feb 2017
#146
Darrell Issa. He also called Barack Obama "the most corrupt president in American history."
StevieM
Feb 2017
#142
Agreed. Issa is the most loathsome or all, and he's a crook. Goudy was the pinhead I was thinking...
brush
Feb 2017
#165
Reality: HRC is getting old. We all get old. We have younger voices willing to step up.
Eyeball_Kid
Feb 2017
#19
I agree, we need fresh faces, younger voices. Newer generations now need to take
RKP5637
Feb 2017
#35
Smirky, plus they aren"t spring chicks anymore......70 is the age of Bill, Hill & Bernie
Jim Beard
Feb 2017
#156
I agree and would say that looking at the last batch of possible nominees is something that always
karynnj
Feb 2017
#100
It's up to her. I will look at the field and make my choice when the time comes. nt.
NCTraveler
Feb 2017
#42
The GOP was always going to sell the fake email scandal. They were never going to fail to lie
StevieM
Feb 2017
#170
You miss my point. Had HRC given the SD all the emails when she left -- there would likely have been
karynnj
Feb 2017
#173
No. But I would like to see her in the media a bit more in, say six months...
Freethinker65
Feb 2017
#60
I think we need some new blood as well. There are people that would never vote for her,
woodsprite
Feb 2017
#64
HRC isn't running again but her election would not have constituted a dynasty.
StevieM
Feb 2017
#138
We need to be focusing on developing nationally competitive candidates,
Sen. Walter Sobchak
Feb 2017
#113
No, not really. She had two chances for the gold ring, that's more than many others
MrScorpio
Feb 2017
#141
She is just too divisive, we don't need a candidate that so many people really don't like.
FreeStateDemocrat
Feb 2017
#174