Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NewJeffCT

(56,848 posts)
65. 100% agree with you
Mon Feb 27, 2017, 02:29 PM
Feb 2017

Before the Comey letter, Clinton had just crushed Trump in the 3rd debate and the ABC News tracking poll had her over the important 50% threshold, while Trump was below 40% - I think it was 51-38%? The day after the letter comes out, the tracking poll tanked and Trump surged to a 44-43% lead, a flip of 14 points in one day! Without that letter, Clinton likely would have continued to climb in the polls and all those Trump voters that decided in the last week would have either stayed home or voted 3rd party (and, maybe a few vote Clinton).

While Clinton ended up recovering a small lead in the ABC news poll, she never came anywhere close to that 13 point lead.

Somewhere around 10-12% of the electorate decided in the last week and around 75% of them voted for Trump. Just doing the math, that means around 13-14 million decided after the Comey letter came out and 75% of them voted Trump, or 9.5 to 10 million. Let's say that without that letter, conservatively, those 13-14 million split 50-50. That means Trump would have gotten 3 million fewer votes overall, or 6.5 to 7 million.

Those extra votes swing MI, PA and WI to Clinton, as well as FL and NC. Possibly Arizona as well.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Not only that, but we also have to investigate election rigging down ballot meow2u3 Feb 2017 #1
Feingold stuck with me; I couldn't believe he didn't win. nt babylonsister Feb 2017 #4
my thought as well... dhill926 Feb 2017 #7
I think you are getting warm! triron Feb 2017 #14
Russia was way deep into Wisconsin Botany Feb 2017 #19
As to the technicalities of how to mess with election results: triron Feb 2017 #29
Then why don't the results in counties that were hand counted versus machine counted mythology Feb 2017 #39
Where in my post did I say one word about vote hacking? Botany Feb 2017 #50
+1, people keep throwing up this strawman of vote hacking as if we're all stupid !!!! uponit7771 Feb 2017 #52
As if giving one stat from the election doesn't change the fact the election(s) were dirty Botany Feb 2017 #55
and I *DO* mean **RIGGED** LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #56
+1, ... and the intel report SAYING the Russia involved themselves in the election on the side of uponit7771 Feb 2017 #58
So Rupert Murdoch's WSJ took a look at one of the few states where recounts are actually possible. lagomorph777 Feb 2017 #59
He had a 12 point lead then in a matter of days he was tied INdemo Feb 2017 #30
They (Trumpskies) collaborated with the Russians triron Feb 2017 #32
indeed they did. nt LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #57
That one bothered me too...nt 2naSalit Feb 2017 #42
+ eleventy billion Lucinda Feb 2017 #47
I can't believe it either. calimary Feb 2017 #72
Same here. Same thing I saw in 2004. And results not matching exit polls again, just like Amaryllis Feb 2017 #6
No, just no. Exit polls are riddled with flaws mythology Feb 2017 #40
fact: exit polls only became "riddled with flaws" after 2000. nt TheFrenchRazor Feb 2017 #45
BINGO!!!!!!! ElementaryPenguin Feb 2017 #63
You're absolutely correct, google 'red shift' if you want to see how bad it is. diane in sf Feb 2017 #75
BULL FUCKIN SHIT !!! ... that was only after 2000 voter purging in Florida did EPs get flawed uponit7771 Feb 2017 #53
True what you said. Hartmann has spoken and written extensively on this and he is very carefull Amaryllis Feb 2017 #67
+1, the Russians can easily hack Crosscheck and there go the votes needed for dems to win uponit7771 Feb 2017 #68
And it was even reported in MSM BEFORE THE ELECTION that Russians hacked Amaryllis Feb 2017 #69
knr triron Feb 2017 #70
+ 1,000 Achilleaze Feb 2017 #16
This needs to go to all read counties that flipped, a good percentage of them are wondering about uponit7771 Feb 2017 #2
Interesting read about hacking elections triron Feb 2017 #15
+1, the "they didn't hack the voting machines" meme is a distraction at best. They don't have to uponit7771 Feb 2017 #17
flip the programmers sarah FAILIN Feb 2017 #28
Trade secret... 2naSalit Feb 2017 #43
too risky? how precisely would a hacker be ID'd, caught, and sufficient evidence found to convict sa TheFrenchRazor Feb 2017 #46
Until we have paper ballots and automatic audits and recounts EVERY TIME, it's all vapor. lagomorph777 Feb 2017 #60
what filter did they put Perez's photo through? It looks like he's covered in tiny ants. KittyWampus Feb 2017 #3
Lol Luciferous Feb 2017 #10
You made me LOL...yes ants indeed...NOT a good photo fer sure! angstlessk Feb 2017 #11
I was thinking the same thing. LOL n/t Zing Zing Zingbah Feb 2017 #13
I've not seen a lot of pictures of the man and none that close up before Ligyron Feb 2017 #73
He needs to figure how dems lost thousands of seats since 2008 and getting msongs Feb 2017 #5
I was watching msnbc Steve Kornacki election night VelvetPetals Feb 2017 #12
pretty much. nt TheFrenchRazor Feb 2017 #48
Keep up the good work Mr. Perez... Talk Is Cheap Feb 2017 #8
The right tone and the right perspective. Unvarnished truth. This is encouraging nt delisen Feb 2017 #9
Down ballot too...my GOSH, I can't believe how many people came after me for saying this LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #18
Same here. I thought I was expressing my opinion.... Honeycombe8 Feb 2017 #24
we are in the same boat to be sure...Funny how I don't see them here now LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #35
I also thought killing DU on election day was not a coincidence. Honeycombe8 Feb 2017 #76
I think there was a coordinated effort on many fronts... LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #79
Not only the pre-election polls you cite triron Feb 2017 #37
Yeah evidence doesn't matter. Outrage is all that matters mythology Feb 2017 #41
you have NO evidence that it WASN'T hacked, because, oh yeah, the votes are invisible, and TheFrenchRazor Feb 2017 #49
Yes, that could be done. Could. Not necessarily that it did happen. Honeycombe8 Feb 2017 #78
It's the discussion that's important. Honeycombe8 Feb 2017 #77
I like the cut his jib. Botany Feb 2017 #20
Finally, somebody is talking about it Percy Cholmondeley Feb 2017 #21
I believe videohead5 Feb 2017 #22
Exactly. zanana1 Feb 2017 #51
And Remember videohead5 Feb 2017 #64
Same, Comey is a bastard uponit7771 Feb 2017 #54
100% agree with you NewJeffCT Feb 2017 #65
Thank God! BadgerMom Feb 2017 #23
loving him more n more samnsara Feb 2017 #25
Agree and like his comebacks to drumpf on twitter regarding Tom being DNC chair..priceless iluvtennis Feb 2017 #31
Music to my ears blueseas Feb 2017 #26
Perez is ready to go to work, we have lots to accomplish, United we can get on Thinkingabout Feb 2017 #27
This!!!!! AgadorSparticus Feb 2017 #33
ImWithTom. oasis Feb 2017 #34
Let's get to work bdamomma Feb 2017 #36
Yessir! Hekate Feb 2017 #38
Investigate, yortsed snacilbuper Feb 2017 #44
I like this guy flamingdem Feb 2017 #61
I hope Tom has read this article BSdetect Feb 2017 #62
Uh yeah... MontanaMama Feb 2017 #66
shameless kick nt LaydeeBug Feb 2017 #71
Don't forget about Rudy/Comey and his buddies at the FBI! Rex Feb 2017 #74
knr triron Feb 2017 #80
keep on front burner!! triron Feb 2017 #81
knr triron Feb 2017 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tom Perez: "We need to be...»Reply #65