General Discussion

TDale313

(7,822 posts)

66. No one said don't attack her.

Wed Mar 1, 2017, 04:41 PM

Mar 2017

We absolutely should. And there's plenty to attack. But when you attack any woman *for* being a woman, you're attacking all women. And that's what you're doing when you use those slurs.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

193 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Calling a woman a skank, tramp, bitch, whore, stripper is still misogyny [View all] B2G Mar 2017 OP

If We're Talking Kellyanne. . . ProfessorGAC Mar 2017 #1

I never know if the subject is Kellyann or Melania n/t leftstreet Mar 2017 #2

I was wondering the same thing. NurseJackie Mar 2017 #21

The point is that it doesn't matter who the target is. n/t Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #189

With the enemy....anything goes. ileus Mar 2017 #3

Nope- misogyny is bigotry and against the TOS. We had enough this past year, thanks. bettyellen Mar 2017 #13

So it's fine to call Colin Powell the n word then? meadowlander Mar 2017 #15

Not with me it doesn't. Whenever words that have misogynistic MineralMan Mar 2017 #34

Agreed. The only name any of them need to be called are liar and fascist, these are correct. Eliot Rosewater Mar 2017 #152

Right? LOL Lib Mar 2017 #43

The words in the OP are not making fun of her looks. Demit Mar 2017 #54

She is female. That's all it is. For all her faults liquid diamond Mar 2017 #61

"possesing a vagina prohibits you from calling her certain names regardless of how accurate" JTFrog Mar 2017 #106

Read my previous posts. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #111

Last year, some here considered Hillary "the enemy," and called her the C-word. Nuh-uh. Hekate Mar 2017 #168

Pay attention. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #169

"It's OK to slut shame women who are actually sluts" meadowlander Mar 2017 #177

That double standard exists because women can get sex much more easily than a man can. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #181

Um, no. meadowlander Mar 2017 #182

No one said don't attack her. TDale313 Mar 2017 #66

Cheeto chose to be orange OriginalGeek Mar 2017 #85

Ehh I hear all of you. LOL Lib Mar 2017 #97

It's not about her. That's the point. TDale313 Mar 2017 #172

Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #65

No. Language that derives its power from slut shaming makes our culture more misogynistic. femmedem Mar 2017 #90

How about if it's a Republican who is gay? You feel OK about pulling out Squinch Mar 2017 #99

If you can't come up with a better reason to dislike someone of the opposing political persuation, hughee99 Mar 2017 #190

I hope you don't cut your lip shaving. That would be bad. LanternWaste Mar 2017 #191

100% agreed Caliman73 Mar 2017 #4

Of course it is - but it seems much more fun to pile on people we don't like, even women. jmg257 Mar 2017 #5

I am a woman, and jrthin Mar 2017 #6

+1 coco22 Mar 2017 #7

I tend to agree. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #10

Under what circumstances is it appropriate to call a woman a skank or a tramp? meadowlander Mar 2017 #22

How nice you have arrived to defend GOP women... Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #49

meadowlander is defending all women Demit Mar 2017 #62

Oh please...after the abuse heaped on the Obama's I couldn't give a damn. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #122

ah, there it is. "that person is an asshole, therefore i have every right to be an asshole too" frankieallen Mar 2017 #131

Wasting your time...I personally don't say some of the stuff I see. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #165

It's not a waste of time for two reasons. meadowlander Mar 2017 #184

I called Kelly Ann trashy and she is. LenaBaby61 Mar 2017 #107

Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #55

Lol, what would you call a husband who would sleep with a skank, then? Demit Mar 2017 #68

a dick? mnhtnbb Mar 2017 #88

Dick, prick, dickhead, wanker, tosser, jerk-off ... 11 Bravo Mar 2017 #92

You should look up the last three words for the, um, solitary aspect of their meanings. Demit Mar 2017 #100

You asked for examples. I provided them. Please don't pretend ... 11 Bravo Mar 2017 #108

What? I meant that the 3 last words all mean masturbation, and thus wouldn't Demit Mar 2017 #116

Three questions: Are the terms almost exclusively applied to males? 11 Bravo Mar 2017 #124

None of those is making a moral judgment on the man- they equal "jerk" .... bettyellen Mar 2017 #136

Go back, read the first post in the subthread, & try to follow the gist. Demit Mar 2017 #139

I love seeing us at each others throats ornotna Mar 2017 #163

Ex-husband, in my case. He's still the father of my children. Shrike47 Mar 2017 #155

Thank you for the reminder that it IS 2017. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #63

Very well put hamsterjill. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #71

Thank you. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #79

Women can be just as misogynistic as men. JTFrog Mar 2017 #167

Wow- I'm surprised you're so emotionally invested in this man and wife's personal decisions... bettyellen Mar 2017 #78

I'm not emotionally invested in this man at all. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #89

Sure you are - sharing what you imagine to be the story of their private lives with strangers and bettyellen Mar 2017 #114

Oh, good grief! hamsterjill Mar 2017 #119

Neither you nor I knows what goes on between those two people or how they really feel about it. bettyellen Mar 2017 #121

I'm not sure why you worry about how I spend my time. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #145

Nope - peering into the private lives of consenting adults and judging is not progressive - bettyellen Mar 2017 #149

Fuckin' A. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #185

She has plenty of opinions about others and has expressed them in this thread. mnhtnbb Mar 2017 #186

Yes. I see that! hamsterjill Mar 2017 #187

That old guy sounds like my Dad. Ligyron Mar 2017 #95

It is a common story with men: they are easily deceived when it comes to mnhtnbb Mar 2017 #105

Or they like sex enough to be happy with their situation- whatever it looks like to you? bettyellen Mar 2017 #115

Beyond skank. She's an amoral predator. elehhhhna Mar 2017 #127

Exactly. hamsterjill Mar 2017 #147

I agree that there are times to call liquid diamond Mar 2017 #26

Progressives don't judge consenting adults or use a woman's sexuality to shame her...period. bettyellen Mar 2017 #35

My post had nothing to do with liquid diamond Mar 2017 #50

This is no better than anyone judging Hillary for staying in her marriage... these things bettyellen Mar 2017 #69

So, when is the N word appropriate? wryter2000 Mar 2017 #141

How did the "N" word become a part of this? hamsterjill Mar 2017 #146

We're not wryter2000 Mar 2017 #171

so what if a non-white person acts very badly? do they "deserve" the N-word? the correlation is TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #175

As far as I'm concerned wryter2000 Mar 2017 #192

+2 Ligyron Mar 2017 #87

++ mnhtnbb Mar 2017 #94

They claim calling one woman a whore liquid diamond Mar 2017 #113

Nope. Just that it's a gendered slur when applied inaccurately to people not in the profession bettyellen Mar 2017 #134

So under some circumstances, is the N word OK with you? How about gay slurs? Squinch Mar 2017 #102

What about someone's jrthin Mar 2017 #126

Are you serious that you would want to describe behavior by using similar slurs against women? Squinch Mar 2017 #135

I am a woman, and you are wrong. Oneironaut Mar 2017 #153

Your statement is not logical. Dark n Stormy Knight Mar 2017 #164

wow. talk about not getting it. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #174

And btw, if a woman strips jrthin Mar 2017 #8

'Exotic dancers' and 'sex workers' are job descriptions leftstreet Mar 2017 #12

Because sexually empowered women are bad meadowlander Mar 2017 #20

I called myself what I was. A stripper. bravenak Mar 2017 #76

ITA ;-) JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #14

A stripper. meadowlander Mar 2017 #16

It's not "common sense" its denigration of a woman's sexuality and misogynistic bettyellen Mar 2017 #30

"Couch gate" is the dumbest fucking thing ever. phleshdef Mar 2017 #9

Couchgate isn't about what she did ... it's about the hypocrisy of the right wing SFnomad Mar 2017 #31

I totally agree about the hypocrisy of the right wing phleshdef Mar 2017 #39

I agree. It's a pointless distraction. Oneironaut Mar 2017 #161

Oh well get used to it JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #11

That's the spirit that brought us the Civil Rights movement. meadowlander Mar 2017 #17

I called Kellyanne trashy and classless for the couch thing, but.. demmiblue Mar 2017 #18

Another one I saw (regarding the couch photo): demmiblue Mar 2017 #19

Thank you Bucky Mar 2017 #70

Your post up-thread should not have been hidden. demmiblue Mar 2017 #125

I have also noted they have come from newer members but also Maru Kitteh Mar 2017 #25

You make a good point. n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #45

This crazycatlady Mar 2017 #23

I would use the same words myself. Ligyron Mar 2017 #104

Agreed, but she is very smelly. Maru Kitteh Mar 2017 #24

What do we call a woman who liquid diamond Mar 2017 #27

A sex worker. What do you call them? n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #28

Exactly what I thought. Lol. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #32

What do you call them? Those women? n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #33

I call them what dictionary definition applies. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #36

You should call them what they prefer leftstreet Mar 2017 #40

Nope. I don't interact with such people. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #51

So what do you call them? Labels are fluid and change as societies develop. demmiblue Mar 2017 #44

I call them hookers sarah FAILIN Mar 2017 #72

And if you call a woman a stripper or a hooker, B2G Mar 2017 #73

a lie sarah FAILIN Mar 2017 #96

Thank you. This excessive PC bullshit liquid diamond Mar 2017 #74

You're welcome. sarah FAILIN Mar 2017 #98

A sex worker, prostitute, or some other word that means what you MineralMan Mar 2017 #38

I've been saying that people should be labeled liquid diamond Mar 2017 #56

Really. None of the execrable behaviors she has exhibited have MineralMan Mar 2017 #57

Good point ! Wash. state Desk Jet Mar 2017 #110

And pus-filled wen has a nice ring to it . . . Vinca Mar 2017 #84

Well, I thought so, anyhow. MineralMan Mar 2017 #93

A prostitute True Dough Mar 2017 #46

I agree with your last sentence. liquid diamond Mar 2017 #52

Is this about Kellyane? TNLib Mar 2017 #29

Links please. Kingofalldems Mar 2017 #37

Puhlease, I got a post hidden for linking to a poster's well documented transphobic history on DU. demmiblue Mar 2017 #48

Yep loyalsister Mar 2017 #41

Agreed. That the woman in question is a woman is immaterial MineralMan Mar 2017 #42

I agree with skank, tramp, whore, slut and c_nt True Dough Mar 2017 #47

Post removed Post removed Mar 2017 #53

Well aren't you a special kind of judgemental. B2G Mar 2017 #60

Apparently you have to be Suzy Homemaker. demmiblue Mar 2017 #67

Bitch is misogyny? usedtobedemgurl Mar 2017 #58

Here at DU it is. We're not your personal circle of friends, so.... bettyellen Mar 2017 #82

I understand it is not that hard.... usedtobedemgurl Mar 2017 #117

It's probably the mildest gender slur- and like all slurs "in group usage" doesn't have the same bettyellen Mar 2017 #120

I am surprised you are still here.. coco22 Mar 2017 #132

Is that against TOS? usedtobedemgurl Mar 2017 #178

A couple factual points: One, DU has been fighting over the word "bitch" since at least 2004. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #140

OK, thank you.... usedtobedemgurl Mar 2017 #179

Here's my take, and I am fully aware that my opinions are not some universal truth any more than Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #183

I agree, meadowlander Mar 2017 #188

Maybe. Like I said, pretty much every argument that could be had on the word "bitch", was run Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #193

Unfortunately people tend to lose perspective when dealing with "other" mythology Mar 2017 #59

Correct musette_sf Mar 2017 #64

Here we go again. Let's all hold hands and sing kumbayah because surely Vinca Mar 2017 #75

I'm not talking about them. B2G Mar 2017 #77

I don't use the terms myself, although I've been known to yell a certain word at her when she Vinca Mar 2017 #81

For many they are just words sarisataka Mar 2017 #86

uneducated Melania went all birther underthematrix Mar 2017 #80

what is it when we call men dicks, pricks, etc? nini Mar 2017 #83

well .... CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #130

Are you saying she's a gold digger? Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #142

well it seems to be the case CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #143

She aint.. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #144

she is a birther CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #148

I'm making a joke, in reference to a Kanye West song. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #160

"Stripper" is also a job description so be careful Warpy Mar 2017 #91

That's only okay if you're conservative or Donald J. Trump tenderfoot Mar 2017 #101

I called her a skank I won't do it anymore if it's disturbing but - luvMIdog Mar 2017 #103

Compared to what she does JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #109

No kidding CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #150

Non- gendered words like "trashy" and "asshole" can come in handy! bettyellen Mar 2017 #123

Classless. Common. Cheap. NurseJackie Mar 2017 #154

my neighbor calls her a "slut" CountAllVotes Mar 2017 #137

Agreed! Anybody who's ever been in the military knows how easy and corrosive dehumanizing is. NWCorona Mar 2017 #112

Dehumanizing is a good point! Have been disturbed to hear DT refer to him as as "what voted" or ... bettyellen Mar 2017 #118

Thank you....Quite a few here need to hear that whathehell Mar 2017 #128

really? where you been? I not only believe it, i expect it. frankieallen Mar 2017 #129

Someone thinks "stripper" is an insult? MountCleaners Mar 2017 #133

It's happened here before wryter2000 Mar 2017 #138

Yes and the bulk of those who make excuses for slurs decamped here for JPR where no word is bettyellen Mar 2017 #158

Blatant hypocrisy here. Oneironaut Mar 2017 #151

Yep! Look at the people on this thread judging other women for relationships and slurring them... bettyellen Mar 2017 #157

+1 million! Thank you! Oneironaut Mar 2017 #159

It's the same as judging HRC's marriage and that was just as disturbing because when you look at the bettyellen Mar 2017 #162

The double standard Dallasdem1988 Mar 2017 #156

Obviously it does no good to try to educate some people. JTFrog Mar 2017 #166

I agree. cwydro Mar 2017 #170

you are of course correct, but principles are "relative" to many here. nt TheFrenchRazor Mar 2017 #173

I find it interesting that the first post I saw here of Kellyanne on the Oval rzemanfl Mar 2017 #176

I think we should hold hearings on the matter. njhoneybadger Mar 2017 #180