Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

angrychair

(12,358 posts)

6. What is confusing about this exchange?

Reply to Miles Archer (Original post)

Fri Mar 3, 2017, 12:31 PM

Mar 2017

Senator Franken:
But if true, it's obviously extremely serious and if there is any evidence that anyone affiliated with the trump campaign communicated with the Russian government in the course of this campaign, what will you do?

Senator Sessions:
Senator Franken, I'm not aware of any of those activities. I have been called a surrogate at a time or two in that campaign and I didn't have - did not have communications with the Russians and I'm unable to comment on it.

There is no ambiguity in Franken's question. Sessions was an experienced US senator and college educated. If he has a problem understanding that question, his response does not convey any confusion or misunderstanding.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

VERDICT IS IN at Fox & Friends! NO PERJURY, just a "tortured, circuitous, long, crazy question" [View all] Miles Archer Mar 2017 OP

Well, I mean, come on. It's Steve Doocy. Tommy_Carcetti Mar 2017 #1

CASE CLOSED - as per fox and friends! Laf.La.Dem. Mar 2017 #2

You can't nail us sleaze-weasels!! Dem2 Mar 2017 #3

Bwahahaha! MineralMan Mar 2017 #4

Whatever Lotusflower70 Mar 2017 #5

What is confusing about this exchange? angrychair Mar 2017 #6

Well it's waaaaaaay to hard for an Attorney General grantcart Mar 2017 #8

Response doesn't match the question BruceWane Mar 2017 #10

Didn't have, did not have Phoenix61 Mar 2017 #15

Isit any wonder? Archae Mar 2017 #7

I understand that Kilmeade and Doocy require short sentences with small words, drm604 Mar 2017 #9

the question is completely beside the point. his knowingly made a false statement under oath. unblock Mar 2017 #11

How long before a Trump tweet... lame54 Mar 2017 #12

Pandering to their core viewers ProudLib72 Mar 2017 #13

Because politicians never ask long questions. Liberal In Texas Mar 2017 #14

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»VERDICT IS IN at Fox & Fr...»Reply #6