Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Thor_MN

(11,843 posts)
29. Try it with the whole context.
Sun Mar 5, 2017, 09:09 PM
Mar 2017
tell that joke and ask if we should eliminate all Arabic influences in our educational system. When I get the inevitable red face "YES", I tell that joke and ask how we are going to run computers on the Roman Numeral System. I continue to ask questions until they agree that they don't know what they are talking about.


The poster talks of eliminating Arabic influences and posits that computers are useless without Arabic numbers.

The fact is computers don't use numbers in terms of Arabic or Roman numbering systems. I'm sorry that you are falling for the same fallacy that the poster believes Right Wingers will, but it is wrong and nothing you can say will change that.



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't think Trump ever read the Bible left-of-center2012 Mar 2017 #1
Trump's bible is probably hollowed out and full of prescription pills. sunonmars Mar 2017 #2
No! No! left-of-center2012 Mar 2017 #4
Oh I know. Mendocino Mar 2017 #3
I don't think Trump reads anything! Initech Mar 2017 #15
It's been said that he's dyslexic FakeNoose Mar 2017 #26
A couple of Corinthians walk into a bar and one raises 2 fingers and says grantcart Mar 2017 #5
Right Wingers are generally idiots, but computers aren't run on Arabic numbers... Thor_MN Mar 2017 #6
The binary is 1s and 0s BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #8
You defeated your own argument. The 1s and zeros are representations of ons and offs. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #10
Not at all BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #14
Your are incorrect, Arabic numerals are not needed by computers. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #18
I have had programming since 1979 too BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #21
Wow, your incorrectness must really be eating at you. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #22
Sorry I don't play silly games. BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #23
Perhaps you need to step back from your irrelevant tirades Thor_MN Mar 2017 #24
Here is the post BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #27
Try it with the whole context. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #29
You just created a whole new fabricated world out of that post BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #30
You are the one changing the context of your arguments. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #31
Soon as your meds wear off, maybe you'll have a more cogent conversation BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #32
I'm at least a decade from retirement and actually work programming. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #33
Enjoy the rest of your night. BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #34
Ah, yet another post null of content... Thor_MN Mar 2017 #35
The Arabic number most used is 0. MineralMan Mar 2017 #9
The Romans were aware of zero, they just didn't have a separate symbol for it. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #11
Which explains why the entire western world adopted MineralMan Mar 2017 #12
That why I already explained what you just said with "it's just a lot easier to use decimal." Thor_MN Mar 2017 #13
No, they do not. However the people who use them do. MineralMan Mar 2017 #17
The point is that Arabic numbers are not required for computers to operate. Thor_MN Mar 2017 #19
Most early computers used decimal numbers. hunter Mar 2017 #37
How many of those are in operation today? Thor_MN Mar 2017 #38
Blast those Islamic thinkers and their concept of a number that's neither real or imaginary! crosinski Mar 2017 #20
An unexpected use of that verse csziggy Mar 2017 #7
I only know it because Mendocino Mar 2017 #16
... Mendocino Mar 2017 #25
Can one hope that Trump will soon become a man? eom guillaumeb Mar 2017 #28
After 70 years of childhood, Mendocino Mar 2017 #39
Being truthful would also be a welcome change. guillaumeb Mar 2017 #40
I've heard that DU Mendocino Mar 2017 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So a couple of Corinthian...»Reply #29