Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

blm

(114,773 posts)

4. Seriously - Mark Levin and other Breitbart propagandists never have to back up their claims and

Reply to ck4829 (Reply #3)

Sun Mar 5, 2017, 09:19 PM

Mar 2017

charges made against Obama and Clinton all these years. I say we take advantage of this opportunity and go along completely with Congressional hearing into Trump's accusation against Obama.

I want Dems to demand DETAILS into their operation, just as was demanded of Dan Rather and CBS. Mark Levin and Breitbart won't be able to come up .000001% of the evidence that Rather presented.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I'm all FOR Congressional hearing on wiretap fairytale. Put Mark Levin/Breitbart editors UNDER OATH [View all] blm Mar 2017 OP

Yup. Bring it on. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #1

If it were legal, that sounds like an excellent idea. guillaumeb Mar 2017 #2

I welcome Trumpgate. ck4829 Mar 2017 #3

Seriously - Mark Levin and other Breitbart propagandists never have to back up their claims and blm Mar 2017 #4

Hauling in "journalists" (real ones and ones with quote marks) to testify is dicey territory. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2017 #5

I think many here remember the hullaboo about Valerie Plame BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #7

I was thinking Mary Richards, but yeah. Gidney N Cloyd Mar 2017 #8

I will be Master of the Obvious and say - Mark Levin is not a journalist. blm Mar 2017 #9

Don't they just need an undisclosed source jmg257 Mar 2017 #6

He's not a reporter, at all. He made up a fabulous conclusion that he got the SCROTUS to believe blm Mar 2017 #10

And he'll agree w/you...he read a bunch of reports and put together a theory which trump believed. jmg257 Mar 2017 #11

Except Roger Stone, Carter Page and Paul Manafort were not part of the campaign at that point blm Mar 2017 #12

UGH - I am going crazy trying to keep up with what is true and what's not, and the timelines. jmg257 Mar 2017 #13