Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Paul Krugman: A Party Not Ready to Govern [View all]
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/06/opinion/a-party-not-ready-to-govern.html?_r=0A Party Not Ready to Govern
Paul Krugman MARCH 6, 2017
According to Politico, a Trump confidante says that the man in the Oval Office or more often at Mar-a-Lago is tired of everyone thinking his presidency is screwed up. Pro tip: The best way to combat perceptions that youre screwing up is, you know, to stop screwing up.
But he cant, of course. And its not just a personal problem.
It goes without saying that Donald Trump is the least qualified individual, temperamentally or intellectually, ever installed in the White House. As he veers from wild accusations against President Obama to snide remarks about Arnold Schwarzenegger, hes doing a very good imitation of someone experiencing a personal breakdown even though he has yet to confront a crisis not of his own making. Thanks, Comey.
But the broader Republican quagmire the partys failure so far to make significant progress toward any of its policy promises isnt just about Mr. Trumps inadequacies. The whole party, it turns out, has been faking it for years. Its leaders rhetoric was empty; they have no idea how to turn their slogans into actual legislation, because theyve never bothered to understand how anything important works.
snip//
At this point, then, major Republican initiatives are bogged down for reasons that have nothing to do with the personality flaws of the tweeter in chief, and everything to do with the broader, more fundamental fecklessness of his party.
Does this mean that nothing substantive will happen on the policy front? Not necessarily. Republicans may decide to ram through a health plan that causes mass suffering, and hope to blame it on Mr. Obama. They may give up on anything resembling a principled tax reform, and just throw a few trillion dollars at rich people instead.
But whatever the eventual outcome, what were witnessing is what happens when a party that gave up hard thinking in favor of empty sloganeering ends up in charge of actual policy. And its not a pretty sight.
20 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It's because capitalism, left to its own devices, creates the society that the Republicans' masters
ProfessorPlum
Mar 2017
#2
Absolutely. My first thought on waking this a.m. was "are we just going to let them kill everything
JudyM
Mar 2017
#13
More concise terms you're saying that is no actual effective party working for the common person?
nolabels
Mar 2017
#15
They've gone from greedy unscrupulous bastards to raving meth-addled sadists.
lagomorph777
Mar 2017
#8