Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

grasswire

(50,130 posts)

3. 16 states are involved

Reply to jpbollma (Original post)

Thu Jun 28, 2012, 11:26 PM

Jun 2012

and as Lawrence O'Donnell's expert said tonight, while those states would have to pay out some money to accept the federal money, eventually those states will see that the ACA is going to save states many dollars in other ways, and their budgets may allow participation.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Happy For Today's Ruling, But What About Medicaid? [View all] jpbollma Jun 2012 OP

Congress has to pass legislation that will induce the states EFerrari Jun 2012 #1

The states that are refusing to extend Medicaid aren't doing it for the money. Zalatix Jun 2012 #6

Well, that may be right but we'll have to see. EFerrari Jun 2012 #7

Few states will opt out, in all probability frazzled Jun 2012 #2

"They are not going to leave out this neediest group." EFerrari Jun 2012 #4

16 states are involved grasswire Jun 2012 #3

Thank you for the information! jpbollma Jun 2012 #5

Current federal funding for Medicaid is 50% for the big blue states FarCenter Jun 2012 #8

It's No Shock jpbollma Jun 2012 #9