Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TheKentuckian

(26,314 posts)
6. A down ticket goal. Super popular but missing the point.
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 02:07 AM
Jun 2012

What we need is universal access to a national exchange if any of the market forces are even going to be more than a selling point for rubes.

Two throw away issues for most folks but the only ways for the scheme to actually even have a chance to work and to bear a passing resemblance to what the bill is touted as.

Deleting the bullshit "Cadillac" tax which over time will send us all to bronze land and imposing direct cost controls would be great, maybe even impose MLR's where they can contain cost rather than acting as an incentive to increase them, like on the pharmaceutical companies, durable medical equipment, hospitals, you know where the rubber meets the road rather than just at the purse when the cartel controls the allowable charges and they are below market. The MLR is also set where the industry self reported, there is some elasticity there because there has been some clean up of the definitions and yes there will be rebates but they speak to minimal impact of the signature cost containment element (not wanting to press the other major one much, the aforementioned "Cadillac" tax which is meant to diminish care) because as a percentage of health care dollars they are insignificant.

There are elements that could make a real overhaul but they are not being applied correctly and sometimes willfully hogtied.

I also think the anti-trust exemption has to go, the ability to collude and fix prices is a legitimate threat to make a mockery of the whole effort. Any aspect they don't wish to comply with is a little unity away from being folded on. The cartel has been given too big to fail status and there is no alternative gatekeeper to keep them in line.

Some kind of effort to limit pool fragmentation is critical, any impact of systemic savings will always be minimized especially the fool's gold of the savings from the uninsured being in the system. By the time you pass the nickles through many thousands of fragmented mini-pools and groups it just isn't much bang there.

It may even sound like nit picking but these sort of little seeming adjustments actually demand some rather serious remaking of the wheel.
The biggest appeal to many is "having something to build on" and that is the essential issue the structure is essentially the same shit we have now.

I want a public option, if for no other reason than to impose a systemic check on the cartel so that we have no choice but fold to their united front but it doesn't work save for a dumping ground for undesirables as things stand.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

More states will adopt it, as well, considering that the Medicare expansion... joshcryer Jun 2012 #1
The ACA is great jpbollma Jun 2012 #2
We deseprately need to get back the House and implement a federal public option. joshcryer Jun 2012 #4
It would be nice if we got it back in 2012 here. Bolo Boffin Jun 2012 #5
A down ticket goal. Super popular but missing the point. TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #6
I trust that Sanders/Vermont will become keenly aware of issues that will zero in on the correct mother earth Jun 2012 #7
Bernie is one Senator and the law is passed TheKentuckian Jun 2012 #19
Example is huge, and I prefer to use everything we have to get to our destination, if you will... mother earth Jul 2012 #20
First a public option is not the same as single payer. TheKentuckian Jul 2012 #21
Mandatory private insurance is the HERITAGE foundation's solution. "Move left" my eye. nt Romulox Jun 2012 #9
Our health care system is just learning to crawl... it will sprint soon. nt Comrade_McKenzie Jun 2012 #3
Single payer has been smothered in its crib. nt Romulox Jun 2012 #8
Cool ProSense Jun 2012 #10
Sorry. But can you put that in the form of a list? No blue links = not convincing. Romulox Jun 2012 #11
No ProSense Jun 2012 #13
RE: happiness-- I wouldn't trade places with you for all the blue links in the world! Romulox Jun 2012 #14
You seem insecure. n/t ProSense Jun 2012 #15
LOL. And you seem to be out of ammunition! No links, no argument! nt Romulox Jun 2012 #16
Is that all ProSense Jun 2012 #17
You seem insecure. n/t Romulox Jun 2012 #18
We'll start working on transforming ACA into Single Payer, *RIGHT AFTER* the NAFTA renegotiations Romulox Jun 2012 #12
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Today's ACA win does not ...»Reply #6