Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Maybe--I have never liked the JS-Observer-Kushner link. hlthe2b Mar 2017 #1
I see nothing in his post to doubt. OKNancy Mar 2017 #2
Count me in the skeptical column salin Mar 2017 #11
Hi there OKNancy Mar 2017 #14
I also thought of Bev Harris salin Mar 2017 #20
I was taken in until quite recently by Assange, Snowden and Greenwald, GliderGuider Mar 2017 #85
Right on, right on... pbmus Mar 2017 #102
Except that he's completely misstated what Mensch reported on. That's a glaring mistake. msanthrope Mar 2017 #27
all I know is she is a nut OKNancy Mar 2017 #42
Ok....she's a nut. So why not directly quote the nut, to prove her nuttiness? "Nuts and sluts" msanthrope Mar 2017 #43
I'm not going to spend a lot of time on Mensch, Denzil_DC Mar 2017 #57
I'm not in disagreement with her. msanthrope Mar 2017 #62
So you're up for WWIII? PaulaFarrell Mar 2017 #69
Mensch is starting WWIII.....well fuck that is a world of power. msanthrope Mar 2017 #77
Someone quoted to you that she would like to see 'regime change' in Russia PaulaFarrell Mar 2017 #88
Really? Regime change in Russia has occurred quite a bit. Tell me when nukes were used. nt msanthrope Mar 2017 #91
I'm getting peeved... JCannon Mar 2017 #5
ok, where's your blog? eShirl Mar 2017 #19
I found it by searching on his user name, + liberal blog salin Mar 2017 #22
Perhaps hlthe2b Mar 2017 #45
You DARE to talk about "anonymity"? JCannon Mar 2017 #52
Hey, Joe! peggysue2 Mar 2017 #99
Required reading OKNancy Mar 2017 #3
When I have Greenwald and the rest of the claimed "Far Left" decrying the Deep State, msanthrope Mar 2017 #12
Good point ymetca Mar 2017 #81
Your concern for our wellbeing is touching. GliderGuider Mar 2017 #4
To clarify GliderGuider Mar 2017 #6
Discredit? SecularMotion Mar 2017 #8
I follow them both. I don't make policy based on their writing, but GliderGuider Mar 2017 #10
The truth is out there - and in time we will find Nance, Mensch, and Schindler were right JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #32
I get your point about his 20committee handle, drm604 Mar 2017 #7
let's not bring facts into this. nt msanthrope Mar 2017 #13
Oh, sorry. drm604 Mar 2017 #16
You seem concerned. Please feel free to air more of your concerns, and enjoy your stay. nt msanthrope Mar 2017 #9
well, of course, we have to take Mensch's and Schindler's posts with grains of salt Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #15
Mensch has her Patriobotics blog - it's more than a tweet JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #34
sure, she's more of a real reporter than Schindler Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #41
Disagree theglammistress Mar 2017 #17
Yep - they are up there with Mr. Nance on this issue JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #29
And other commentators I TRUST IMPLICITLY link to Mensch and Schindler. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #65
Very good point! get the red out Mar 2017 #78
+10000 n/t JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #92
Y'know who was the first blogger to emphasize the Russian connection? JCannon Mar 2017 #55
Next time share the link of the original post. bathroommonkey76 Mar 2017 #18
Oh lord... JCannon Mar 2017 #25
All that from the number 20 Progressive dog Mar 2017 #21
Bizarre that you're reading something nefarious into his 20committee handle yodermon Mar 2017 #23
Thanks yodermon! n/t JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #28
I swear, all of a sudden, I miss Octafish. nt msanthrope Mar 2017 #31
Me too! JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #36
Octafish would have taken better-sourced jabs. But yeah....the Purity Concerns raised here miss the msanthrope Mar 2017 #38
Here's something - Paul Roderick Gregory JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #49
Gregor is writing utter, and easily disproveable nonsense....in 2011, Trump was a candidate..... msanthrope Mar 2017 #53
Adam Khan? His stuff is in depth. dem4decades Mar 2017 #54
Yes, his tweets provide quite a lot to do further research. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #67
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. JCannon Mar 2017 #35
Who is the well-known writer? msanthrope Mar 2017 #40
Thomas C. Theiner ? OKNancy Mar 2017 #47
This is the first I've heard of Theiner JCannon Mar 2017 #56
Mensch and Schindler i still take with a huge grain of salt given their conservative bona fides yodermon Mar 2017 #61
Has anyone ever believed that Ilsa Mar 2017 #24
I'm with Louise Mensch on this - n/t JustAnotherGen Mar 2017 #26
It is sometimes very smart to make COMMON CAUSE against a mutual enemy. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2017 #30
Mensch & Schindler's work has been very beguiling. Surely, though annabanana Mar 2017 #33
This message was self-deleted by its author -Steph- Mar 2017 #37
Schindler and Mensch put their names to their work. Do you? Renew Deal Mar 2017 #39
Of course. Do YOU? JCannon Mar 2017 #46
I want your aunts blood type and a hair from each of your dogs. Renew Deal Mar 2017 #58
You realize that nobody here knows you, right? GliderGuider Mar 2017 #70
But they have a BLOG! KittyWampus Mar 2017 #80
My argument speaks for itself JCannon Mar 2017 #95
your 'argument' is largely a conspiracy around the name "20 Committee" and Schindler himself KittyWampus Mar 2017 #98
Yes, that is my privilege. GliderGuider Mar 2017 #100
As long as their allegations continue to be proven later by fact Mr. Ected Mar 2017 #44
this . . .n/t annabanana Mar 2017 #59
Schindler has been fierce critic of Assange/Wikileaks for years and defender of NSA wishstar Mar 2017 #48
Please do not tell ME kpete Mar 2017 #50
I'm reccing this because of the note of caution it sounds about Schindler and Mensch, Denzil_DC Mar 2017 #51
So, the long game is simply to Ilsa Mar 2017 #60
No matter what I read or hear .. ananda Mar 2017 #63
A newcomer trying to discredit two people who have actually been fairly accurate exposing Trump KittyWampus Mar 2017 #64
Makes plausible sense and given the track record....... nolabels Mar 2017 #66
Wow! Only 24 posts and full of Russian and Wikileaks talking points! Koinos Mar 2017 #68
Well said. GliderGuider Mar 2017 #71
Thank you. Koinos Mar 2017 #76
100% GliderGuider Mar 2017 #79
I agree with everything you say. Koinos Mar 2017 #83
THIS... nt pkdu Mar 2017 #86
Louise mensch is a laughingstock in the UK PaulaFarrell Mar 2017 #72
As was said above, GliderGuider Mar 2017 #84
Her only agenda is herself PaulaFarrell Mar 2017 #90
One blogger, casting asparagus on a couple of other bloggers. MineralMan Mar 2017 #73
It's hugh. Series, even. nt msanthrope Mar 2017 #103
Excellent and important info flamingdem Mar 2017 #74
hokey net journalism bigtree Mar 2017 #75
Sorry, Milo saidsimplesimon Mar 2017 #82
Nah Schindler seems very anti-Russian, anti-Snowden and anti-wiki leaks TNLib Mar 2017 #87
Thank you blogslut Mar 2017 #89
The OP made a conspiracy out of the name "20 Committee" and it was explained by someone posting KittyWampus Mar 2017 #93
Not to mention her FISA warrant scoop GliderGuider Mar 2017 #97
Caution is the point peggysue2 Mar 2017 #94
We are all cautious now riverwalker Mar 2017 #96
Yeah, grain of salt. No, shit, we get it. hatrack Mar 2017 #101
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»DOUBLE CROSS: John Schind...»Reply #86