General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: DOUBLE CROSS: John Schindler, Louise Mensch and other "spooky" writers in the anti-Trump movement [View all]GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)And I feel quite privileged to have that privilege, thankyouverymuch.
I'm not hung up on peoples liberal credentials. I read their arguments. Their arguments make sense to me, and actually address the topic of Trump/Russia - as do those of Malcolm Nance, Adam Khan, Rachel Maddow and others, in virtually identical terms. You have presented nothing of substance on that topic. Do you even know who Aleksandr Dugin, Vladislav Surkov and Valery Gerasimov are, and why they may be critically important to this event?
Now, let's talk about ad-hominem, shall we?
Your post amounts to a personal smear of those two based largely on their socio-political leanings and who they have worked for. That's a classic example of ad hominem. You then compound the error with your inability to find out what "XX Committee" represents to John Schindler - by simply reading this page of his blog. By doing so you might also have figured out that Schindler is not part of some mysterious group named "XX Committee", it's the name he gave his own personal blog.
With accuracy like that on display, you're double-damned right that I take the word of those people over yours.
Now, what have you done to help pierce the veil of mystery surrounding Trump's connections to Russia? Because that's the only measure that matters at the moment. If you can't show THAT work, you're just another blogger with an attitude problem, no matter how long you've been at it.