Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(167,792 posts)
13. Here's some more excerpts
Fri Mar 10, 2017, 09:36 AM
Mar 2017

(am a subscriber)

<...>

Then-Acting Attorney General Sally Yates first told McGahn in late January that Michael Flynn, then Trump’s national security adviser, was potentially susceptible to Russian blackmail because he had misled senior administration officials about the nature of his communications with the Russian ambassador to the United States. Flynn had said publicly that he did not discuss U.S. sanctions imposed on Russia when he spoke with the ambassador in late December, when in fact he had.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer said Tuesday that McGahn briefed the president and a small group of senior advisers soon after receiving the message and conducted his own review to determine if Flynn had acted illegally. Spicer said McGahn determined Flynn had not, although Flynn had nonetheless lost the president’s trust. Late Monday, Flynn resigned.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/who-is-donald-mcgahn-the-fiery-lawyer-at-the-center-of-virtually-every-trump-controversy/2017/02/14/7dd185b4-f2cd-11e6-8d72-263470bf0401_story.html


Of course we are coming to know more and more of Flynn's subterfuge that they covered up.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Well, we all know volstork Mar 2017 #1
"None of the above." - republican Draft-&-Tax-Dodger-in-Chief Achilleaze Mar 2017 #2
Poor little sociopath, can't break every rule in the book. DK504 Mar 2017 #17
While I'm glad to see her called out on it Ligyron Mar 2017 #3
Ignorance of the law is no excuse--especially when you work in the WH. catbyte Mar 2017 #4
She is an attorney and should understand the principle of an ethical conflict. Tanuki Mar 2017 #5
Lol, thanks for the laugh. nt JTFrog Mar 2017 #6
Oh, make no mistake about it: I hate the woman. Ligyron Mar 2017 #18
Overblown? Hardly. Ethics violations aren't something to just scoff at. JTFrog Mar 2017 #19
She's a lawyer, psychopath and a grifter. littlemissmartypants Mar 2017 #20
Drumpf refused to give his staff (previously standard) ethics training BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #8
The three things they are lacking the most - leadership, ethics and management. George II Mar 2017 #11
Because they "know all and nothing existed before them". nt BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #14
Trump's real purpose in the Presidency is to make money and take bribes. gordianot Mar 2017 #9
Re: "the White House's top lawyer" mahatmakanejeeves Mar 2017 #7
Here's some more excerpts BumRushDaShow Mar 2017 #13
"Not a button down guy" ornotna Mar 2017 #21
I sure don't understand the GOP throwing out all the rules and law for Trump and his world wide wally Mar 2017 #10
Maybe this will help 90-percent Mar 2017 #12
I think it's more selectively than randomly imo. nt. Amimnoch Mar 2017 #15
knr Lucinda Mar 2017 #16
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Cummings Asks White House...»Reply #13