Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why have they been hiding Rep Joe Kennedy III [View all]bettyellen
(47,209 posts)59. Chelsea had attack dogs in her just for tweeting the last few months....
And Caroline got trashed pretty bad when named as Japanese ambassador. When it was her turn in the spotlight, the sins of the fathers were trotted out for everyone to reconsider.
Just saying I don't see the same for these guys. And it's looking pretty darned sexist at this point. I don't see anyone calling them princes or claiming their entitled, despite their gilded pedigree.
Just like Trump, somehow their leg up isn't noticeable. But HRC who grew up middle class and worked harder than anyone expected a "coronation" and her daughter is a non starter.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
104 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
After a year hearing how "dynasties" are the worst and Chelsea better not run for anything...
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#60
Time and place for everything. And St Paddy's Day is coming up. Irish Democrats
KittyWampus
Mar 2017
#7
I didn't. As a non-Catholic, it didn't hurt HER not to have the Catholic annulment. The divorce
pnwmom
Mar 2017
#41
That's because non-Catholics don't understand it's the only way for Catholics to get divorced
pnwmom
Mar 2017
#40
I don't see it that way- like "indulgences" it's a way for the church to allow the wealthy to skirt
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#72
It isn't an erasure of the marriage. It says the Sacrament -- which the wife didn't believe in --
pnwmom
Mar 2017
#79
the sacrament IS marriage. And it's a weasel move to allow the wealthy and powerful
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#81
Ratstinker's Vatican is nasty. They can't stand Pope Francis and are trying to push him out.
pnwmom
Mar 2017
#94
It is a Catholic sacrament and it does NOT affect the legality of the civil marriage.
pnwmom
Mar 2017
#88
Yeah and it makes a mockery of the sacrament to allow people to undo it after a dozen years and two
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#97
I bet people won't stomp on either of these dudes ambitions the way many did with Chelsea....
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#13
Especially funny when you see this excitement over dudes who've been rich for generations!
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#35
How is it "on his own" when his dad, grandad and a few grand uncles all held
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#48
HA -dynasties were a dirty word all last year... and wrongly used to describe HRC
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#58
Thanks for this information about Kennedy. I also admire his demeanor, ...
northoftheborder
Mar 2017
#37