Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

theaocp

(4,570 posts)
Fri Jun 29, 2012, 11:33 AM Jun 2012

Why do employers continue to pay for health insurance? [View all]

It's an interesting question, since it seems like a massive expenditure that appear to have no matching upsides for the employer. Thoughts?

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It has an upside for employers Matt_in_STL Jun 2012 #1
Tons of businesses run without offering health insurance. Sick employees get fired and replaced. Zalatix Jun 2012 #10
I definitely agree with your point Matt_in_STL Jun 2012 #20
Yes, that much is quite true. Zalatix Jun 2012 #23
not so much in skilled industries. for unskilled labor it is more common. dionysus Jun 2012 #47
Yeah, this is going to sting unskilled labor, big time. Zalatix Jun 2012 #48
It's cheaper to get a group plan than to pay enough for employees to buy their own. HopeHoops Jun 2012 #2
I don't think that's necessarily true. Most employers pay a percentage of the premium riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #7
Yup, your calcs are correct. Zalatix Jun 2012 #13
wow, do you teach Ethics classes? Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #21
Other businesses won't listen. Sociopathy is the core of capitalism. Zalatix Jun 2012 #22
And THAT is how we will FINALLY get to universal coverage SoCalDem Jun 2012 #26
This is one of the things I have been saying. ACA has flaws which will become glaringly obvious kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #29
Yes, agreed. This is the inherent flaw in "every man for himself". closeupready Jun 2012 #32
Yep, I've been saying this for 2 years now. And I agree 100% that change will come when riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #38
Why did you not drop it before? ieoeja Jun 2012 #34
My husband is only 4 years out from his last round of Stage IV, Grade IV lymphoma. riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #37
You just made a DAMN good argument in favor of single-payer!!! HopeHoops Jun 2012 #44
most qualified employees won't answer an ad that doesn't include healthcare. stlsaxman Jun 2012 #3
Really? In this job market? You think anyone can afford to be that selective? riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #11
And due to the tax/mandatory purchase, they won't be covering their loans now. Zalatix Jun 2012 #14
It was all part of a strategy to attract and keep competent talent KansDem Jun 2012 #27
The only work available in my area seems to be P/T, under $15/hr, no benefits. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #30
Tax loophole. Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #4
and that counts as expenses for the business so the employer pays less in taxes as well Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #24
Exactly. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #42
It's a ball and chain they attach B Calm Jun 2012 #5
Definitely true. Laelth Jun 2012 #8
Well Nye Bevan Jun 2012 #49
i wouldn't have health insurance if it weren't for my job fizzgig Jun 2012 #6
savings and efficiency loyalsister Jun 2012 #52
The ACA is a move in the direction to de-couple employment and health care delivery. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #9
I believe that as well. Employers are going to be dropping coverage. I'm sure of it riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #15
Believe it or not, the auto manufacturers are HUGE supporters of Single Payer. Ikonoklast Jun 2012 #19
Yup, I've read that as well. riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #25
It seems to me that the ACA actually reinforces employer-based health insurance. BlueCheese Jun 2012 #45
Personally, I believe the provision that mandates insurers take every applicant is the key riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #46
Wouldn't the insurance exchanges offer a person the ability to move to a job that..... soccer1 Jun 2012 #51
Access to healthcare shouldn't be tied to a job Lex Jun 2012 #12
+1000000000. nt riderinthestorm Jun 2012 #16
Heavily subsidized tax breaks from the government to corporations for health coverage. yardwork Jun 2012 #17
It started as an incentive to employees....then turned into something they felt they *had* to offer cbdo2007 Jun 2012 #18
Employers aren't really paying anyway. Live and Learn Jun 2012 #28
I know. I don't get that either. closeupready Jun 2012 #31
Because it's a competitive benefit. Gormy Cuss Jun 2012 #33
You Need Quality Employees To Keep A Business Running Yavin4 Jun 2012 #35
If you are unemployed and qualified to be a benefits consultant, you should get a job right now FarCenter Jun 2012 #36
It doesn't seem to make much sense. Quantess Jun 2012 #39
Big companies do it because they actually OWN the insurance "company" or are self-insured. CBGLuthier Jun 2012 #40
Because some business owners still believe in Doing the Right Thing lapislzi Jun 2012 #41
I can definitely see the possibility of a gradual reduction in employer-sponsored health insurance.. Swede Atlanta Jun 2012 #43
Alot of them no longer do Marrah_G Jun 2012 #50
In theory, an employer who pays X for salary and Y for insurance premiums lumberjack_jeff Jun 2012 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why do employers continue...