Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

progree

(12,968 posts)
22. 28 states have signed on. 6 more needed to pass the 2/3 threshold to call a Con Con
Sat Mar 11, 2017, 09:01 PM
Mar 2017
According to Article V of the U.S. Constitution, 34 state legislatures have to call for a Constitutional Convention in order for it to be convened. ((Also called a "Con Con" -Progree))

In 2014 – what halcyon days – this seemed like another of Farris’s many fringe projects. Specifically, it seem­ed like a new and doomed way to push his beloved “Parental Rights Amendment,” which would make home­schooling a constitutional right. Despite his diligence, and some existing support for the idea within the GOP (40 Republican representatives introduced a parental rights measure in 2009), it’s obviously come to nothing so far.

Now it looks like Farris may just get what he wants. In These Times reported in January that 28 states have now called for a constitutional convention, and this, coupled with Republican gains in state legislatures last November, means that Farris’s big idea may now be just a few states away from becoming reality.

There are some risks, of course. Once a Constitutional Convention is convened, ADF and its allies in state legislatures can’t control how it would play out. Representatives could pass anything from the Equal Rights Amendment to an amendment banning school vouchers. As Stanford University’s Jack Rackove told me in 2014, “Anything you want to propose is up for consideration. You can’t definitively say whether or not it would be a ‘runaway’ convention.” This is precisely why the late Phyllis Schlafly opposed the idea.

But the Religious Right might not have a better moment to advance its goal of American theocracy. ((and of course the right-wing greedbangers in general promoting yet more wealth concentration, destruction of civil liberties and on and on -Progree))

http://au.org/church-state/march-2017-church-state/viewpoint/the-con-con-con


The above is from au.org - Americans United for Separation of Church and State. From the March 2017 issue of their Church and State magazine. So it's from the perspective of worrying about dissolving the separation of church and state and imposing right-wing theocracy on us all. But of course a "con con" would undoubtedly deal with more than gay marriage and teaching "creation science" and ending women's right to choose, taxpayer funding of religious schools, to name just a few right-wing theocracy goals.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Do you have a legitimate source for this? Foamfollower Mar 2017 #1
thank you. nt Skidmore Mar 2017 #2
This is a few years old, but it's from the Washington Post. Crunchy Frog Mar 2017 #6
THat is a great article. It would be worth a new post now even though it's old, with a note about Amaryllis Mar 2017 #20
28 states have signed on. 6 more needed to pass the 2/3 threshold to call a Con Con progree Mar 2017 #22
Watch Thom Hartmann on DU's Video & Multimedia and decide for yourself elleng Mar 2017 #7
Nobody affiliated with RT can be trusted. Foamfollower Mar 2017 #8
Don't trust your own judgment, elleng Mar 2017 #9
No, won't waste my time on an RT mouth of Putin. Foamfollower Mar 2017 #10
Remaining ignorant is your choice. elleng Mar 2017 #15
And listening to a Putin mouthpiece is yours. Foamfollower Mar 2017 #23
I KNOW a putin mouthpiece when I hear one, elleng Mar 2017 #25
One CANNOT be affiliated with RT and NOT be a Putin mouthpiece. Foamfollower Mar 2017 #26
Agree about Hartmann. But! Try Jane Mayer's Hortensis Mar 2017 #13
Bullshit. Thom Hartmann is trustworthy. SalviaBlue Mar 2017 #19
thank you for posting this jodymarie aimee Mar 2017 #3
He is brilliant and a stickler for fact checking and has fought for election integrity for years. . Amaryllis Mar 2017 #18
Citizens for Self-Governance is very real pat_k Mar 2017 #4
In other words they are trying to kill off the poor and middle class. I understand that. They cant caroldansen Mar 2017 #5
I think they wouldn't do this. This would be enough to cause a war or two. Initech Mar 2017 #17
Reminds me of PNAC back in the day; that went belly-up babylonsister Mar 2017 #11
I'm thinking that ALEC has been working in the vineyards of this effort for years. . .n/t annabanana Mar 2017 #12
This is why I'm 150% against the idea of a constitutional convention. Initech Mar 2017 #14
Thom Hartmann aside ... LenaBaby61 Mar 2017 #16
Then I would have to risk my life for the Revolution. WinkyDink Mar 2017 #21
Oh yeah? Well left-wing "thousandaires" have a project going ... dawg Mar 2017 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Right-Wing Billionaires H...»Reply #22