Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Right-Wing Billionaires Have a Project Going to Rewrite Our Constitution, & They Are Shockingly Clos [View all]progree
(12,968 posts)22. 28 states have signed on. 6 more needed to pass the 2/3 threshold to call a Con Con
According to Article V of the U.S. Constitution, 34 state legislatures have to call for a Constitutional Convention in order for it to be convened. ((Also called a "Con Con" -Progree))
In 2014 what halcyon days this seemed like another of Farriss many fringe projects. Specifically, it seemed like a new and doomed way to push his beloved Parental Rights Amendment, which would make homeschooling a constitutional right. Despite his diligence, and some existing support for the idea within the GOP (40 Republican representatives introduced a parental rights measure in 2009), its obviously come to nothing so far.
Now it looks like Farris may just get what he wants. In These Times reported in January that 28 states have now called for a constitutional convention, and this, coupled with Republican gains in state legislatures last November, means that Farriss big idea may now be just a few states away from becoming reality.
There are some risks, of course. Once a Constitutional Convention is convened, ADF and its allies in state legislatures cant control how it would play out. Representatives could pass anything from the Equal Rights Amendment to an amendment banning school vouchers. As Stanford Universitys Jack Rackove told me in 2014, Anything you want to propose is up for consideration. You cant definitively say whether or not it would be a runaway convention. This is precisely why the late Phyllis Schlafly opposed the idea.
But the Religious Right might not have a better moment to advance its goal of American theocracy. ((and of course the right-wing greedbangers in general promoting yet more wealth concentration, destruction of civil liberties and on and on -Progree))
http://au.org/church-state/march-2017-church-state/viewpoint/the-con-con-con
In 2014 what halcyon days this seemed like another of Farriss many fringe projects. Specifically, it seemed like a new and doomed way to push his beloved Parental Rights Amendment, which would make homeschooling a constitutional right. Despite his diligence, and some existing support for the idea within the GOP (40 Republican representatives introduced a parental rights measure in 2009), its obviously come to nothing so far.
Now it looks like Farris may just get what he wants. In These Times reported in January that 28 states have now called for a constitutional convention, and this, coupled with Republican gains in state legislatures last November, means that Farriss big idea may now be just a few states away from becoming reality.
There are some risks, of course. Once a Constitutional Convention is convened, ADF and its allies in state legislatures cant control how it would play out. Representatives could pass anything from the Equal Rights Amendment to an amendment banning school vouchers. As Stanford Universitys Jack Rackove told me in 2014, Anything you want to propose is up for consideration. You cant definitively say whether or not it would be a runaway convention. This is precisely why the late Phyllis Schlafly opposed the idea.
But the Religious Right might not have a better moment to advance its goal of American theocracy. ((and of course the right-wing greedbangers in general promoting yet more wealth concentration, destruction of civil liberties and on and on -Progree))
http://au.org/church-state/march-2017-church-state/viewpoint/the-con-con-con
The above is from au.org - Americans United for Separation of Church and State. From the March 2017 issue of their Church and State magazine. So it's from the perspective of worrying about dissolving the separation of church and state and imposing right-wing theocracy on us all. But of course a "con con" would undoubtedly deal with more than gay marriage and teaching "creation science" and ending women's right to choose, taxpayer funding of religious schools, to name just a few right-wing theocracy goals.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
26 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Right-Wing Billionaires Have a Project Going to Rewrite Our Constitution, & They Are Shockingly Clos [View all]
Hestia
Mar 2017
OP
THat is a great article. It would be worth a new post now even though it's old, with a note about
Amaryllis
Mar 2017
#20
28 states have signed on. 6 more needed to pass the 2/3 threshold to call a Con Con
progree
Mar 2017
#22
He is brilliant and a stickler for fact checking and has fought for election integrity for years. .
Amaryllis
Mar 2017
#18
In other words they are trying to kill off the poor and middle class. I understand that. They cant
caroldansen
Mar 2017
#5
I'm thinking that ALEC has been working in the vineyards of this effort for years. . .n/t
annabanana
Mar 2017
#12