Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: THEY SAID NO! [View all]Initech
(108,115 posts)19. Calling them "deplorable" is being too kind.
I'd have far more uglier words to call them, but as they said on Animal House, my words would be "so profound and disgusting that the decorum prohibits me from listing them here".
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Me either. Unlike most of our politicians, some people still have ethics and
notdarkyet
Mar 2017
#14
Hillary made a big mistake and was honest in telling voters in the Appalchian coal mining states
maddiemom
Mar 2017
#53
Never. Why would you make some arbitrary cut-off where people either know shit or don't?
JCanete
Mar 2017
#69
Exactly, and just now a Rep from Kentucky was saying they are still learning that ACA is not
flamingdem
Mar 2017
#57
I think it's time to tell them to leave their bibles, hatred and gunz behind and let's elect
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#6
Agreed. Obama and Clinton support for trade deals past and present did not serve them well.
BlueWI
Mar 2017
#93
Nance- glad you're here. This "defective Democrats; failed candidate" crap doesn't resonate with me.
NBachers
Mar 2017
#23
Yes. It's still the RW propaganda machine that clouds the minds of those who Dems help.
Kablooie
Mar 2017
#26
As soon as you mentioned "working class", I knew I would be erased
UncleTomsEvilBrother
Mar 2017
#27
Short of an intervention on 40% of the electorate, I don't know how we're going to...
Nitram
Mar 2017
#43
a lot of people want those good policies to be better translated into votes
ProfessorPlum
Mar 2017
#46
I always love your posts. You always remind us of the cold, hard truth amidst all of the noise.
butdiduvote
Mar 2017
#63
Again, aside from the media and those types that want to be cow towed to, NOBODY wants us to cow-tow
JCanete
Mar 2017
#68
They weren't told by comey. The media buries or lifts a story at its whims. At best Comey handed it
JCanete
Mar 2017
#80
Okay, fair enough. It isn't that Comey had no influence, its just that he is but one man. If he had
JCanete
Mar 2017
#85
I agree with you that it isn't easy. but as you said, they think the way they do because
JCanete
Mar 2017
#103
be fair though, Sanders didn't have the machine behind him. by choice, and as far as the money goes,
JCanete
Mar 2017
#76
I'm fine with leaving it at that, but your perspective here is certainly restricted to your own
JCanete
Mar 2017
#89
Bernie had plenty of money. And, to be fair, he raised it through an impressive campaign that
StevieM
Mar 2017
#100
