Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: CNN News Staffers Revolt Over Blown Coverage [View all]annabanana
(52,804 posts)56. I hope ALL the CNN staffers get hooked on "Newsroom". .
(give them something to aspire to)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
112 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Yes, nanabugg. You read the last lines of each section first and then go to the beginning.
JDPriestly
Jun 2012
#63
When a decision's more than a hundred pages long you kinda need more than the first few words. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jun 2012
#9
Unfortunately for them, the SCOTUS doesn't release its decisions as Facebook updates n/t
deutsey
Jun 2012
#26
The problem was that BOTH of them wanted to slam the shiite out of the president
Cosmocat
Jun 2012
#67
I did notice they had a job posting for a copy editor as of yesterday afternoon.. (nt)
Posteritatis
Jun 2012
#8
Did that mensa candidate *really* put "CNN" and "gold standard" in one sentence??
Blue_Tires
Jun 2012
#13
I and many others have long regarded CNN as the gold standard in news. The 1st one I turn to for
Honeycombe8
Jun 2012
#105
John King is the slimiest of the lot. He was thrilled that he was able to say that it was damaging
AlinPA
Jun 2012
#17
No, 4 justices said it WAS constitutional both under the commerce and necessary & proper clauses.
RBInMaine
Jun 2012
#93
You're parroting the right wing on this. No, certain foods are discretionary. Healthcare isn't.
RBInMaine
Jun 2012
#108
Ah, no. Supreme Court decisions don't work that way. The details actually matter.
yardwork
Jun 2012
#30
Um, the SCT won't change the way they write opinions to accomodate the "morons" at Fox News and CNN.
WeRQ4U
Jun 2012
#37
They are supposed to be journalists, you don't go on the air with something as important as this
sabrina 1
Jun 2012
#41
That's no excuse. CBS got it right in a sober careful evaluation of what was written. CNN and Fox
AlinPA
Jun 2012
#77
BS! They issue a SYNOPSIS of their decision a few pages long. SCOTUS BLOG had is right immediately.
RBInMaine
Jun 2012
#92
I stopped regularly watching them ever since Wolf Blister orgasmed on-air
aint_no_life_nowhere
Jun 2012
#50
I changed my mind about giving them slack after watching the 10 minutes of reporting
rufus dog
Jun 2012
#29
FOX does it every day. Eventually all Corporate News will just make up a narrative
harun
Jun 2012
#60
They probably had two versions ready to go. That they got it wrong is bad but worse
EFerrari
Jun 2012
#53
I agree. John King was reading his crap about eveything being a failure for the President on this
AlinPA
Jun 2012
#82
My advice to CNN: Stop trying to compete with Fox, and focus on reporting the news.
JDPriestly
Jun 2012
#59