Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "It's Constitutional. Bitches." - Patrick Gaspard, the Executive Director of the DNC [View all]Zorra
(27,670 posts)46. But...wouldn't "It's Constitutional, Limp Dicks!" be far more appropriate?
Or some other sexist slur that refers to males?
Instead of referring to RWers with a nasty word that literally means female dog, but which is commonly used as a generalized misogynistic slur to insult and denigrate women, a slur that infers numerous derogatory connotations primarily targeting women, why not use a male slur to refer to RWers, if it is so imperative for us to use gender based slurs?
It's just not logical.
After all, a very substantial majority of right wingers are male.
,
Out of 435 members of the House, I believe that just 17 are Republican women. Of 100 sitting senators, I think just four are Republican women.
The Republican Party in 2011 looks similar, demographically and ideologically, to the Republican Party that nominated John McCain in 2008. As a group, Republicans continue to be more likely than average to be male, white, married, and religious, and to describe their political views as "conservative.
(Hmmm. I wonder if this is because it is considered a much greater insult to most men to be referred to with a disgusting slur that refers to something inherently female rather than being referred to with a disgusting slur that infers a powerless, weak, and feeble male?)
The word *bitch* is not gender neutral, no matter how the justification spin gets spun. A rose by any other name is still a rose.
Since the slur was aimed at the right, wouldn't a slur such as *Limp Dicks*, or some other slur specifically referring to males, be much more appropriate?
Actually, I don't believe in using gender based slurs at all, and don't use them, and think that maybe an insult like "It's Constitutional, Losers" would have been as just as effective and much more appropriate than any type of group based slur.
I used the slurs *limp dick* and "bitch" in the context of this post for effect in order to help illustrate institutionalized sexism and sexist language.
(Some of this post was satire and
"Misogyny. It is what it is. And it's still misogyny when you do it, Adam" - Eve, circa 10,000,000 BC
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"It's Constitutional. Bitches." - Patrick Gaspard, the Executive Director of the DNC [View all]
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
OP
From a linguistic point of view, I do not find 'motherfucker' to be demeaning or insulting at all.
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#9
If a DUer had posted that, there would be a 400 response thread in meta, by now. nt
Romulox
Jun 2012
#6
Sorry about that. I felt the need for context because words have shared meanings.
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#10
I understand why it doesn't bother some people, but this man was "at work" when he tweeted this,
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#13
No apology is being requested. I am criticizing it from the point of view of his job.
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#20
i'm a woman of some years too, but not nearly as "understanding," let's say.
StarryNight
Jun 2012
#29
greaaat... 71% of DUers think gender-based insults are fine. no surprise. nt
StarryNight
Jun 2012
#24
I did account for that in my OP and it is, essentially, the underpinning of option 1 in the poll.
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#60
in this use, it comes off as someones "bitch" and came across as a slam against women
seabeyond
Jun 2012
#28
Yes, exactly. It serves no purpose. I would not hire a PR person who made such a worthless gamble.
RadiationTherapy
Jun 2012
#43