Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could Rachel actually be a republican? [View all]lapfog_1
(29,831 posts)11. I am more interested in what his source of income is.
what are the tax returns of his 500+ owned entities?
Who has he borrowed money from, who has he paid back.
Why didn't he carry forward that nearly $1 Billion dollar loss from the decade earlier and write off his $36 M in 2005?
Who is he doing business with? Are there more deals like the Florida mansion that he sold to the fertilizer king of Russia? What were the details of that deal anyway?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even then, his tax attorneys are smart enough not to name a source of income 'Russian Bribes."
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#33
You talking about the August 2016 poll? He still got elected, they must not cared much. Heck,
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#50
Nope- Rachel and I are talking about why we need to see his income sources and who he's is debt to
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#56
You are correct, there was also a poll in January. But he was still elected, so I will stick with
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#61
Would love to be wrong. But even if someone connects all those dots, Trump's supporters won't care.
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#74
It doesn't matter what they think. It matters that there's huge support growing to subpoena his
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#75
Well, no, she only announced that after Twitter went wild over her first tweet.
Azathoth
Mar 2017
#19
That's quite the unsupported allegation you call a fact, regardless of your impressionism...
LanternWaste
Mar 2017
#55
No. Give it time. Rome was not built in a day. It's the first step. Watch and wait. And keep
caroldansen
Mar 2017
#23
I know folks feel some kind of way but this is the funniest thing I've read in a while.. lol . lol.
JHan
Mar 2017
#26
That's a ridiculous post from someone who admits to not having watched her show for the last
OnDoutside
Mar 2017
#32
Ummm Rachel DID enhance the story, by putting it in context, in a step by step manner. It is not
OnDoutside
Mar 2017
#36
She is a member of NBC and THEY gave us Trump more than any other network. They want RATINGS
LaydeeBug
Mar 2017
#46
Does green cheese smell better on Mercury, and is it as wonderful to bathe in as alleged?
LanternWaste
Mar 2017
#59
She works for a huge corporate media conglomerate-NBC-which is owned by Comcast.
jalan48
Mar 2017
#62
True. But no. She is trying to turn the world around on a string show. It was overplayed.
The Wielding Truth
Mar 2017
#78
She may have hyped it..but the asshole in the WH had to responded to it....
Historic NY
Mar 2017
#64