Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)

4. And so they can be expected to step up their efforts to accuse anybody and everybody

Reply to PoliticAverse (Reply #3)

Fri Jun 29, 2012, 04:08 PM

Jun 2012

of fraud if they think doing so is profitable.

But if they can't exclude due to pre-existing conditions, my guess is that those questions will no longer appear on applications. Their only purpose is to find a pre-existing condition to deny coverage over.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

8 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

US Supreme court ruling moves California forward with health care reform [View all] RandySF Jun 2012 OP

This is great to hear Control-Z Jun 2012 #1

I certainly hope the applications for medical insurance are shorter and less complicated..... kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #2

'Fraud' is still one of the reasons insurance companies can drop your coverage under the ACA. n/t PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #3

And so they can be expected to step up their efforts to accuse anybody and everybody kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #4

"can't exclude due to pre-existing conditions" PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #5

There is no proposed fine for excluding someone due to pre-existing conditions as far as I know. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #6

I think anything that depends on government vigilance will depend on the specific government PoliticAverse Jun 2012 #7

This is what I like about living in California. RandySF Jun 2012 #8