Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Could Rachel actually be a republican? [View all]LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)57. Your bias is both creative and imaginative...
Your bias is both creative and imaginative... though your allegations lack any objective evidence to support them, much like a bumper-sticker. Keep on truckin', little fella!!!
I did like the "prepare to be oppressed" bit though, as irrational and lazy minds have the time and the privilege to over-dramatize mere discussion to better pretend it's still all about them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Even then, his tax attorneys are smart enough not to name a source of income 'Russian Bribes."
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#33
You talking about the August 2016 poll? He still got elected, they must not cared much. Heck,
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#50
Nope- Rachel and I are talking about why we need to see his income sources and who he's is debt to
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#56
You are correct, there was also a poll in January. But he was still elected, so I will stick with
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#61
Would love to be wrong. But even if someone connects all those dots, Trump's supporters won't care.
Hoyt
Mar 2017
#74
It doesn't matter what they think. It matters that there's huge support growing to subpoena his
bettyellen
Mar 2017
#75
Well, no, she only announced that after Twitter went wild over her first tweet.
Azathoth
Mar 2017
#19
That's quite the unsupported allegation you call a fact, regardless of your impressionism...
LanternWaste
Mar 2017
#55
No. Give it time. Rome was not built in a day. It's the first step. Watch and wait. And keep
caroldansen
Mar 2017
#23
I know folks feel some kind of way but this is the funniest thing I've read in a while.. lol . lol.
JHan
Mar 2017
#26
That's a ridiculous post from someone who admits to not having watched her show for the last
OnDoutside
Mar 2017
#32
Ummm Rachel DID enhance the story, by putting it in context, in a step by step manner. It is not
OnDoutside
Mar 2017
#36
She is a member of NBC and THEY gave us Trump more than any other network. They want RATINGS
LaydeeBug
Mar 2017
#46
Does green cheese smell better on Mercury, and is it as wonderful to bathe in as alleged?
LanternWaste
Mar 2017
#59
She works for a huge corporate media conglomerate-NBC-which is owned by Comcast.
jalan48
Mar 2017
#62
True. But no. She is trying to turn the world around on a string show. It was overplayed.
The Wielding Truth
Mar 2017
#78
She may have hyped it..but the asshole in the WH had to responded to it....
Historic NY
Mar 2017
#64