General Discussion

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)

74. Would love to be wrong. But even if someone connects all those dots, Trump's supporters won't care.

Reply to bettyellen (Reply #72)

Wed Mar 15, 2017, 05:00 PM

Mar 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Could Rachel actually be a republican? [View all] brettdale Mar 2017 OP

Her mistake was in hyping it 90 minutes beforehand on twitter.... scheming daemons Mar 2017 #1

True brettdale Mar 2017 #3

She Tweeted it was from 2005. WinkyDink Mar 2017 #68

Did you pay attention to what DC Johnston said The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #2

Rachel is going to run off with Van Jones True Dough Mar 2017 #6

Every Republican wants to eliminate the AMT oberliner Mar 2017 #58

............. JHan Mar 2017 #4

Some of these threads tonight... BannonsLiver Mar 2017 #5

Rachel is just a slave to ratings like everyone else on TV news world wide wally Mar 2017 #7

It was probably hyped more than it deserved to be, The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #8

My whole point brettdale Mar 2017 #12

It wasn't "nothing." The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #13

Not in a 100 million trillion years Justice Mar 2017 #9

I believe her heart is in the right place. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 #10

I am more interested in what his source of income is. lapfog_1 Mar 2017 #11

And that's why we need the complete tax returns. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2017 #16

Even then, his tax attorneys are smart enough not to name a source of income 'Russian Bribes." Hoyt Mar 2017 #33

74% of the public wants to see full returns.... bettyellen Mar 2017 #47

You talking about the August 2016 poll? He still got elected, they must not cared much. Heck, Hoyt Mar 2017 #50

Nope- Rachel and I are talking about why we need to see his income sources and who he's is debt to bettyellen Mar 2017 #56

You are correct, there was also a poll in January. But he was still elected, so I will stick with Hoyt Mar 2017 #61

That's why Rachel did a show on why we should care, silly. bettyellen Mar 2017 #72

Would love to be wrong. But even if someone connects all those dots, Trump's supporters won't care. Hoyt Mar 2017 #74

It doesn't matter what they think. It matters that there's huge support growing to subpoena his bettyellen Mar 2017 #75

. BainsBane Mar 2017 #14

What the wha...? pnwest Mar 2017 #15

I'm glad that i dropped csble. CentralMass Mar 2017 #17

Sorry that everybody didn't get a cookie. longship Mar 2017 #18

Well, no, she only announced that after Twitter went wild over her first tweet. Azathoth Mar 2017 #19

I saw it too. longship Mar 2017 #20

Donald got a big cookie Azathoth Mar 2017 #21

Nice try. longship Mar 2017 #24

Eh, Trump also 'disagrees' with the CBO Azathoth Mar 2017 #25

Adorable spin leftynyc Mar 2017 #35

That's quite the unsupported allegation you call a fact, regardless of your impressionism... LanternWaste Mar 2017 #55

really? take a look on the internet.....anywhere frankieallen Mar 2017 #71

I love that song. Warren DeMontague Mar 2017 #29

This sounds like something from trumpland rockfordfile Mar 2017 #22

No. Give it time. Rome was not built in a day. It's the first step. Watch and wait. And keep caroldansen Mar 2017 #23

I know folks feel some kind of way but this is the funniest thing I've read in a while.. lol . lol. JHan Mar 2017 #26

I just think people are not thinking about the full import underthematrix Mar 2017 #27

I guess it was up to someone to post the stupidest OP of the day. JTFrog Mar 2017 #28

+1000 Pachamama Mar 2017 #43

She suggested he leaked them himself, but she overhyped. Alice11111 Mar 2017 #30

First, Get Ready To Be Attacked Just For Asking Questions... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #31

That's a ridiculous post from someone who admits to not having watched her show for the last OnDoutside Mar 2017 #32

Huh umm.... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #34

Ummm Rachel DID enhance the story, by putting it in context, in a step by step manner. It is not OnDoutside Mar 2017 #36

Like the DNC emails on Wikileaks? BainsBane Mar 2017 #41

Your bias is both creative and imaginative... LanternWaste Mar 2017 #57

And such a "Bias"... LovingA2andMI Mar 2017 #60

Rachel is a Republican..... DFW Mar 2017 #37

I think she's a liberal who became a well paid television personality DefenseLawyer Mar 2017 #38

No, she is not. How silly. cwydro Mar 2017 #39

I have serious doubts as to weather GWC58 Mar 2017 #40

She is a very firm progressive. always has been. sarah FAILIN Mar 2017 #42

yeah that is probably a big part of it Kimchijeon Mar 2017 #44

2016 returns NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #45

She is a member of NBC and THEY gave us Trump more than any other network. They want RATINGS LaydeeBug Mar 2017 #46

No and these threads are getting ridiculous TNLib Mar 2017 #48

LOL! mcar Mar 2017 #49

Well, Trump is not the billionaire he claims to be C_U_L8R Mar 2017 #51

Ah, now I understand some of the other posts I've been seeing today. herding cats Mar 2017 #52

WTF? Ilsa Mar 2017 #53

Seems she didn't have time to review it. Must've gotten a call it was coming... brush Mar 2017 #54

Does green cheese smell better on Mercury, and is it as wonderful to bathe in as alleged? LanternWaste Mar 2017 #59

She works for a huge corporate media conglomerate-NBC-which is owned by Comcast. jalan48 Mar 2017 #62

True. But no. She is trying to turn the world around on a string show. It was overplayed. The Wielding Truth Mar 2017 #78

What a dumb post Dem2 Mar 2017 #63

She may have hyped it..but the asshole in the WH had to responded to it.... Historic NY Mar 2017 #64

Wow. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2017 #65

lol no fishwax Mar 2017 #66

So shooting yourself in the foot is a GOOD thing now? You're going to dis the Squinch Mar 2017 #67

Ratings. They must of been Huge frankieallen Mar 2017 #69

Could liberals go for more than a day without shooting themselves in the foot? Paladin Mar 2017 #70

Could some DUers actually be that dumb? Hekate Mar 2017 #73

This was not a non-story Zambero Mar 2017 #76

She wanted to get people to watch TexasBushwhacker Mar 2017 #77