Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ms. Toad

(38,484 posts)
3. I don't believe this is the case.
Fri Mar 17, 2017, 08:10 PM
Mar 2017

Can you please provide your source?

From the drafts I've reviewed, the employer change is to the mandate to provide insurance (or the penalties associated with not providing coverage) - not to who can be covered if health insurance is offered (which is covered by laws that predate the ACA).

The only change I'm aware of in connection with pre-existing conditions isn't specifically related to pre-existing conditions - but to a gap in coverage. (With or without pre-existing conditions.) Aside from insurers being able to charge 30% more for one year for a gap in coverage, I believe pre-existing coverage is the same.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Employer-Backed Insurance...»Reply #3