Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

MelissaB

(16,595 posts)
Sun Mar 19, 2017, 09:52 AM Mar 2017

Adam Schiff on Trump campaign & Russia: circumstantial evidence of collusion direct evidence of d [View all]

Last edited Sun Mar 19, 2017, 11:14 AM - Edit history (1)

Adam Schiff on Trump campaign & Russia: “circumstantial evidence of collusion … direct evidence of deception” at start of investigation




Update with article:

Rep. Schiff Defends Committee Examining Russia-Trump Connections

by Kailani Koenig

WASHINGTON — Despite denials from some top intelligence officials that there was any evidence of collusion between associates of Donald Trump's presidential campaign and Russian operatives while Moscow tried to interfere with the 2016 election, Rep. Adam Schiff on Sunday defended the House Intelligence Committee continuing to look into the matter.

Two weeks ago on Meet The Press, James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence under President Obama, denied that any evidence of such collusion existed while he oversaw the work of U.S. intelligence agencies. The Trump administration has also reiterated those denials.

But this Sunday on "Meet The Press," Schiff, D-Calif., told host Chuck Todd, "I was surprised to see Director Clapper say that because I don't think you can make that claim categorically as he did. I would characterize it this way at the outset of the investigation: there is circumstantial evidence of collusion. There is direct evidence I think of deception and that's where we begin the investigation."

Schiff is the ranking Democratic member on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.

Link: http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/schiff-defends-committee-examining-russia-trump-connections-n735391
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
wonder what Joy will have to say this AM? Maybe she will have something to add KewlKat Mar 2017 #1
Adam Schiff is relentless and knows how to raise a ruckus flamingdem Mar 2017 #2
Been seeing a lot of this guy Soxfan58 Mar 2017 #3
IDK what he wants going forward... Wounded Bear Mar 2017 #4
Good news - So why did I just hear Nunes on Faux say ZERO evidence Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #5
Faux is Faux for the exact reason we spell it like this. shraby Mar 2017 #6
It wasn't about the station - It was Nunes, live, saying zero evidence Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #10
Because they lie. tavernier Mar 2017 #7
Many think Nunes is colluding. He has been against Russia investigation. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #16
I think Rachel said he was part of the Trump campaign. triron Mar 2017 #17
I think so too but he also was one of the two the WH asked to tell the media that there was Amaryllis Mar 2017 #18
Yeah, Burr. triron Mar 2017 #19
Yes, and they both did follow marching orders and tell the media there was no there there. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #20
Who is that? (if you don't mind) triron Mar 2017 #21
Wyden. He is on Senate Intel, and he thought it was a big deal. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #23
Wyden is exceptional. triron Mar 2017 #28
I'm realy fortunate to have two great senators and a great rep as well, and I tell them that, too.. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #29
Yeah Rachel said it might be up to the media since pukes all in collusion to cover up. triron Mar 2017 #22
Yes, I think so as well. See this current thread for the latest: MelissaB Mar 2017 #25
Two reasons Loki Liesmith Mar 2017 #27
Circumstantial evidence combined with lack of transparency should be enough to toss him out. randome Mar 2017 #8
I've updated the thread with an article MelissaB Mar 2017 #9
Ok - so that's why Nunes said that - zero evidence. They are playing it very literally - to Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #11
Deception to the wrong people equals Obstruction of Justice Peachhead22 Mar 2017 #12
This won't go anywhere... zentrum Mar 2017 #13
Wonder if Rachel will get him on triron Mar 2017 #14
evidence of deception in itself implies evidence of some collusion. triron Mar 2017 #15
Did you all see this? We will see Schiff asking questions here: Amaryllis Mar 2017 #24
Thanks! MelissaB Mar 2017 #26
kick for visibility triron Mar 2017 #30
Most criminals convicted on circumstantial evidence Juliusseizure Mar 2017 #31
Good to point this out! triron Mar 2017 #32
kick for visibility triron Mar 2017 #33
Adam Schiff is a gem. I still remember R B Garr Mar 2017 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Adam Schiff on Trump camp...