Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

triron

(22,240 posts)

21. Who is that? (if you don't mind)

Reply to Amaryllis (Reply #20)

Sun Mar 19, 2017, 04:56 PM

Mar 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

34 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Adam Schiff on Trump campaign & Russia: circumstantial evidence of collusion direct evidence of d [View all] MelissaB Mar 2017 OP

wonder what Joy will have to say this AM? Maybe she will have something to add KewlKat Mar 2017 #1

Adam Schiff is relentless and knows how to raise a ruckus flamingdem Mar 2017 #2

Been seeing a lot of this guy Soxfan58 Mar 2017 #3

IDK what he wants going forward... Wounded Bear Mar 2017 #4

Good news - So why did I just hear Nunes on Faux say ZERO evidence Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #5

Faux is Faux for the exact reason we spell it like this. shraby Mar 2017 #6

It wasn't about the station - It was Nunes, live, saying zero evidence Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #10

Because they lie. tavernier Mar 2017 #7

Many think Nunes is colluding. He has been against Russia investigation. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #16

I think Rachel said he was part of the Trump campaign. triron Mar 2017 #17

I think so too but he also was one of the two the WH asked to tell the media that there was Amaryllis Mar 2017 #18

Yeah, Burr. triron Mar 2017 #19

Yes, and they both did follow marching orders and tell the media there was no there there. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #20

Who is that? (if you don't mind) triron Mar 2017 #21

Wyden. He is on Senate Intel, and he thought it was a big deal. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #23

Wyden is exceptional. triron Mar 2017 #28

I'm realy fortunate to have two great senators and a great rep as well, and I tell them that, too.. Amaryllis Mar 2017 #29

Yeah Rachel said it might be up to the media since pukes all in collusion to cover up. triron Mar 2017 #22

Yes, I think so as well. See this current thread for the latest: MelissaB Mar 2017 #25

Two reasons Loki Liesmith Mar 2017 #27

Circumstantial evidence combined with lack of transparency should be enough to toss him out. randome Mar 2017 #8

I've updated the thread with an article MelissaB Mar 2017 #9

Ok - so that's why Nunes said that - zero evidence. They are playing it very literally - to Laura PourMeADrink Mar 2017 #11

Deception to the wrong people equals Obstruction of Justice Peachhead22 Mar 2017 #12

This won't go anywhere... zentrum Mar 2017 #13

Wonder if Rachel will get him on triron Mar 2017 #14

evidence of deception in itself implies evidence of some collusion. triron Mar 2017 #15

Did you all see this? We will see Schiff asking questions here: Amaryllis Mar 2017 #24

Thanks! MelissaB Mar 2017 #26

kick for visibility triron Mar 2017 #30

Most criminals convicted on circumstantial evidence Juliusseizure Mar 2017 #31

Good to point this out! triron Mar 2017 #32

kick for visibility triron Mar 2017 #33

Adam Schiff is a gem. I still remember R B Garr Mar 2017 #34