Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

avebury

(11,197 posts)
20. Yes and No.
Sat Jun 30, 2012, 08:42 AM
Jun 2012

While I would prefer single payer, at least it is a start. I work for a state agency and I saw some fellow employees go ballistic over the ruling. As I watched their rants (they were totally against and one railed about how constitutional it was and went on to rant about taxes being flat out unconstitutional and that there should be a revolution):

1. I looked at one lady and thought, if she did not work for the state and have the benefit of a decent health insurance she probably could not get insurance (she has cancer).
2. To the lady who ranted on taxes being unconstitutional I wanted to ask her if she is willing to give up her salary because her salary is paid by taxes. I also wanted to ask her how long it would take her to find a decent job with good insurance if she didn't have her state job. She also gets the benefit of financial aid for classes related to her job which is making it possible for to work on her college degree without having to incur college debt.
3. The only comment I made was that there will not be a revolution. If there was not one after the 2000 Supreme Court decision on the Presidential election there is not going to be one now. There is too much dumbing down of the education process and society in general, people are way to focused on idiotic reality shows, and they want to be able to buy way too much crap for as little as much money as possible. As long as the masses are pacified they aren't going to revolt. One of the ladies replied that she did agree with me on that point.

It is so irritating that people don't think the process through and don't understand that they are only cutting their own throats so to speak.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Yes. No. freshwest Jun 2012 #1
I'd be more relieved if it actually forced insurance companies to honor the contracts zbdent Jun 2012 #2
then read the law CreekDog Jun 2012 #4
Isn't there a statement (about war, but I believe it may apply) something like ... zbdent Jun 2012 #14
if that is true, then wouldn't we be better off with the law than without? CreekDog Jun 2012 #16
They can't do that anymore nadinbrzezinski Jun 2012 #9
I know what you mean. SoutherDem Jun 2012 #3
not for myself, but I am really happy for people who this will help Ghost of Huey Long Jun 2012 #5
i agree, and in our midst, there are a few of those people that ACA will help CreekDog Jun 2012 #12
I know I'm sick and damned tired of mzteris Jun 2012 #6
right on! dionysus Jun 2012 #7
The ACA will fuel the next boom cycle Politicub Jun 2012 #8
Post removed Post removed Jun 2012 #10
Yes. No. kestrel91316 Jun 2012 #11
It's NOT 'REFORM'! my insurance went from $1100/mo in June to $2000 in July tblue Jun 2012 #13
I'd be happier if it actually mandated access to health care instead of the dflprincess Jun 2012 #15
I'm pleased because the GOP is having a fit. Happiest I've been politically in years Populist_Prole Jun 2012 #17
Regardless of what's in the law, it's ALWAYS a victory when Democrats pound a fencepole into the TrollBuster9090 Jun 2012 #18
Wait, who the hell has ever said you oppose single-payer? I don't see that. Zalatix Jun 2012 #19
Yes and No. avebury Jun 2012 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are you pleased with the ...»Reply #20