Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Promising PhilosopherKing Mar 2017 #1
Filibuster won't work red dog 1 Mar 2017 #12
but can they do that midterm? I thought technically they had to wait for a new term Fast Walker 52 Mar 2017 #15
McTurtle can change the rules anytime he wants to. red dog 1 Mar 2017 #23
Let the fucker do it! NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #26
No sh*t Sherlock! FakeNoose Mar 2017 #2
Ironically, if Gorsuch were truly qualified... Girard442 Mar 2017 #4
I agree. Scruffy1 Mar 2017 #27
Indeed, first determine the legitimacy of the election. Our election was swiftboated! L. Coyote Mar 2017 #3
Since the Con may be in his "final" year in office, no nominee should be put forth. KewlKat Mar 2017 #5
That was a great line!!! nt Lucky Luciano Mar 2017 #6
Thank you........... :) KewlKat Mar 2017 #8
You're going to have to do better than "unseemly," Chuck. appal_jack Mar 2017 #7
Vile flamingdem Mar 2017 #9
"full filibuster"? red dog 1 Mar 2017 #14
The whole point of a filibuster is that the Majority Leader on his owncannot stop it. appal_jack Mar 2017 #28
"Cannot stop it"............unless he pulls the nuclear lever. WillowTree Mar 2017 #32
Let him. appal_jack Mar 2017 #33
Let him do it EffieBlack Mar 2017 #42
Senate rules can be changed by a simple majority vote red dog 1 Mar 2017 #34
I've Heard However, . . . ProfessorGAC Mar 2017 #46
well put... bluecollar2 Mar 2017 #16
+1 leftstreet Mar 2017 #17
It's the perfect framing and DU'ers who decide to criticize a Democrat who is doing a good job KittyWampus Mar 2017 #25
Whether Schumer does a good job or not remains to be seen. appal_jack Mar 2017 #39
Still not up to snuff, Chuck: appal_jack Mar 2017 #47
And this is why we need new blood. Tatiana Mar 2017 #40
+1 uponit7771 Mar 2017 #45
every Democratic Senator should be saying this n/t Mr. Sparkle Mar 2017 #10
We need to all call them all to say this. 202-224-3121 JudyM Mar 2017 #22
Hear hear! Duppers Mar 2017 #29
Illegitimate presidency pscot Mar 2017 #11
Unseemly could not be more of an understatement. JDC Mar 2017 #13
I just emailed both Schumer and Gillibrand, MY other senator. pangaia Mar 2017 #18
Gorsuch: "I'd like to convey to you that, at the bottom of my heart, I'm a fair judge." red dog 1 Mar 2017 #19
But they can make the GOP pay in the media sharedvalues Mar 2017 #21
Yep - he is a pretty charming guy Cosmocat Mar 2017 #24
Sorry. Still need 60 votes. NewRedDawn Mar 2017 #30
Gorsuch doesn't deserve to judge a beauty pageant! Initech Mar 2017 #36
Go to the press, Schumer sharedvalues Mar 2017 #20
It would taint Gorsuch Valhallakey Mar 2017 #31
Wait for the next president! Initech Mar 2017 #35
Despite every reason to stop Gorsuch, Are Dems letting him off the hook? red dog 1 Mar 2017 #37
Schumer? Wow, that is spine. Take them on!! Alice11111 Mar 2017 #38
"Unseemly"? I'd with "Wrong!".. Cha Mar 2017 #41
K&R yortsed snacilbuper Mar 2017 #43
Please stay strong and keep fighting for us, Senate Dems. rec, nt. Mc Mike Mar 2017 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Schumer: Unseemly to conf...»Reply #41