Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)why don't the anti-aca folks just form and join the church of i-don't-believe-in-health-insurance? [View all]
you don't have to buy health insurance *or* pay any penalty/tax if you have religious objections.
so go form a religion that doesn't believe in health insurance, or insurance, or health, or whatever.
register a domain name so other antis can join online.
register it with the government as a qualifying religion and fill out whatever paperwork needs to get filled out to qualify for the religious exemption.
in fact you can form many such churches, or have your own church adopt some anti-aca belief into its doctrine.
so many ways to avoid paying the tax. or you could just fill out your 1040 and pay your taxes like the rest of us.
78 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
why don't the anti-aca folks just form and join the church of i-don't-believe-in-health-insurance? [View all]
unblock
Jun 2012
OP
I think he was naive and thought most people would participate in the system if premiums were
Hoyt
Jul 2012
#74
I like her ideology, but frankly, I'll take a partisan over a bipartisan any day.
joshcryer
Jul 2012
#47
Is Obama now going around telling us how not closing Gitmo is the greatest thing ever?
Fumesucker
Jun 2012
#24
had it been called a tax all along would there even be such objections? stabbed in the back, really?
unblock
Jun 2012
#4
did i have a crystal ball, no. but i knew the way sausage is made in washington, so i knew
unblock
Jun 2012
#25
OMB, liberal economists, Paul Krugman all saw a no-mandate approach was more expensive.
joshcryer
Jun 2012
#10
yeah, well, sigh, unfortunately, we didn't get president kucinich and the 75th congress....
unblock
Jun 2012
#41
knowing the way they think, if the idea originated on du, they'll never go near it!
unblock
Jun 2012
#11
well, you're certainly right that the right-wing will always find some cause to get riled up about
unblock
Jun 2012
#37
is it any different than the way the banking industry is enshrined in our housing system?
unblock
Jun 2012
#39
Is the banking industry really the best counter-example you could come up with?
Fumesucker
Jun 2012
#45
i'm not a cheerleader here. i'm just pointing out that there's nothing different about this
unblock
Jul 2012
#50
The mandate is highly divisive, that's made perfectly clear just by this thread.
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#63