General Discussion

Ligyron

(8,006 posts)

1. Then why can't someone bring a case before the court addressing this.

Reply to Mira (Original post)

Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:31 PM

Mar 2017

Now how would that work...

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Mira Mar 2017 OP

Then why can't someone bring a case before the court addressing this. Ligyron Mar 2017 #1

Separation of powers...it can't happen. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #5

What case would you bring? clementine613 Mar 2017 #22

If the Senate goes "nuclear" there will be grounds to sue---and the SCOTUS just indicated McCamy Taylor Mar 2017 #68

Um, no, there won't be grounds to sue. bitterross Mar 2017 #70

WOW! Goood on the Supremes! furtheradu Mar 2017 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author brush Mar 2017 #42

Bad, if they actually did it - mega violation of ethics. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #72

Wow...this is extraordinary. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #3

and fake. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #71

Damn strange times. Control-Z Mar 2017 #4

Fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #74

Wow just wow Lotusflower70 Mar 2017 #6

Fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #75

Fake news site ramblin_dave Mar 2017 #7

Really-with a Deceptive Title Stallion Mar 2017 #39

It pains me that people fall for this stuff BainsBane Mar 2017 #46

50 recs. sigh grantcart Mar 2017 #73

Yes...I read it. Looked like a court case DECISION...not a letter against Gorsich nomination. Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #50

It is a court decision. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #77

Yip, this is about ruling against a decision, not a personal non-endorsement. Echo chamber ThinkProg UTUSN Mar 2017 #65

is this for real? KewlKat Mar 2017 #8

No SCantiGOP Mar 2017 #54

This headline is seriously misleading PJMcK Mar 2017 #9

Thanks, PJMck. elleng Mar 2017 #35

Thanks, PJMcK - When I saw the headline my head almost exploded. Stonepounder Mar 2017 #76

another ray of hope....... dixiegrrrrl Mar 2017 #10

This sounds big, how can you put a man in the SCOTUS that the entire court opposes nt doc03 Mar 2017 #11

Very easily. clementine613 Mar 2017 #16

Yes but I think their opinion should pull some weight with those who can nt doc03 Mar 2017 #18

It should... clementine613 Mar 2017 #25

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #78

I don't trust Bipartisan Report Dem2 Mar 2017 #12

Bipartisan Report is a pro-liberal, clickbait news outlet, Ptah Mar 2017 #13

I'm really tired of fake/skewed "news" from both sides. I've been fact checking on right wing Hoyt Mar 2017 #57

WOO HOO!!!! YES!!!! Sculpin Beauregard Mar 2017 #14

Don't get excited. It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #79

The article cited is a sensationalistic rendering of Tanuki Mar 2017 #15

Bad source inaccurate headline - please delete or edit bettyellen Mar 2017 #17

Yes...it should be corrected or deleted. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #51

Reading is fundamental. RedWedge Mar 2017 #19

All eight?! sheshe2 Mar 2017 #20

No Bradical79 Mar 2017 #32

Link to Think Progress which seems to be the article discussed here: MelissaB Mar 2017 #21

Sorry, but I am not believing that dumbcat Mar 2017 #23

This is a seriously misleading crap headline. tammywammy Mar 2017 #24

Do you find bipartisanreport . com to be a reliable source? n/t sl8 Mar 2017 #26

Needs corroboration from other news outlets like NYT AJT Mar 2017 #27

Nice thought, but justices don't have a say & site isn't credible Panich52 Mar 2017 #28

liars BuddyCa Mar 2017 #29

Bullshit. nt Codeine Mar 2017 #30

Not true Bradical79 Mar 2017 #31

The story is bogus, and it shouldn't be here. lapucelle Mar 2017 #33

This is foolish if, as appears, it is based on a recent decision reached by the Court, elleng Mar 2017 #34

Sorry - all of you who are objecting to the headline and the source Mira Mar 2017 #36

No worries. hrmjustin Mar 2017 #37

U could delete it! Cryptoad Mar 2017 #44

True dat. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #52

So delete it or change the title. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #55

So delete it. n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #62

Could you delete so thread will be locked? Crunchy Frog Mar 2017 #63

I got really excited when I read it too and immediately sent to some friends...from whom Amaryllis Mar 2017 #66

Well,shooot! I'm disappointed. furtheradu Mar 2017 #67

Can you please go back and edit it - or delete it. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #80

That headline is extremely misleading. We have so much bullshit to deal with enough Mar 2017 #38

This is a bizarre characterization of a SCOTUS opinion that was issued last week... Princess Turandot Mar 2017 #40

This is a blatantly false article BainsBane Mar 2017 #41

Fake as fake can be HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #47

Didn't see that coming...... joanbarnes Mar 2017 #43

It isn't coming BainsBane Mar 2017 #45

This is BIG. Equinox Moon Mar 2017 #48

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #82

Excellent!!! RESIST!!!!!! Initech Mar 2017 #49

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #84

K&R... spanone Mar 2017 #53

LOL! This is IN YOUR FACE FAKE NEWS! Vinnie From Indy Mar 2017 #56

Not just in, and no stand was taken per se. truebluegreen Mar 2017 #58

ADMINS... we DO need an option for fake news regarding jury duty! demmiblue Mar 2017 #59

I alerted as a conspiracy theory - the closest category to fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #86

Check your discredited source. This isn't a trustworthy website. procon Mar 2017 #60

Obvious Fake News is Chitown Kev Mar 2017 #61

I had to check to make sure this wasn't the Onion. This is unbelievable and probably... George II Mar 2017 #64

Not from the onion, but it is fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #85

Stop with the fake news! Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #69

Why is this bullshit posted here? onenote Mar 2017 #81

No. All 8 Justices recently overturned a single opinion of Gorsuch. That is all -- no letter pnwmom Mar 2017 #83

Title should be changed... LenaBaby61 Mar 2017 #87