General Discussion

clementine613

(561 posts)

22. What case would you bring?

Sun Mar 26, 2017, 08:52 PM

Mar 2017

Are you going to sue in court that Gorsuch is not qualified? Can't do it because there are no qualifications for SCOTUS.

On what grounds would you bring a case where SCOTUS could rule that Gorsuch can't be seated on the court?

Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] Mira Mar 2017 OP

Then why can't someone bring a case before the court addressing this. Ligyron Mar 2017 #1

Separation of powers...it can't happen. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #5

What case would you bring? clementine613 Mar 2017 #22

If the Senate goes "nuclear" there will be grounds to sue---and the SCOTUS just indicated McCamy Taylor Mar 2017 #68

Um, no, there won't be grounds to sue. bitterross Mar 2017 #70

WOW! Goood on the Supremes! furtheradu Mar 2017 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author brush Mar 2017 #42

Bad, if they actually did it - mega violation of ethics. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #72

Wow...this is extraordinary. Demsrule86 Mar 2017 #3

and fake. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #71

Damn strange times. Control-Z Mar 2017 #4

Fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #74

Wow just wow Lotusflower70 Mar 2017 #6

Fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #75

Fake news site ramblin_dave Mar 2017 #7

Really-with a Deceptive Title Stallion Mar 2017 #39

It pains me that people fall for this stuff BainsBane Mar 2017 #46

50 recs. sigh grantcart Mar 2017 #73

Yes...I read it. Looked like a court case DECISION...not a letter against Gorsich nomination. Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #50

It is a court decision. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #77

Yip, this is about ruling against a decision, not a personal non-endorsement. Echo chamber ThinkProg UTUSN Mar 2017 #65

is this for real? KewlKat Mar 2017 #8

No SCantiGOP Mar 2017 #54

This headline is seriously misleading PJMcK Mar 2017 #9

Thanks, PJMck. elleng Mar 2017 #35

Thanks, PJMcK - When I saw the headline my head almost exploded. Stonepounder Mar 2017 #76

another ray of hope....... dixiegrrrrl Mar 2017 #10

This sounds big, how can you put a man in the SCOTUS that the entire court opposes nt doc03 Mar 2017 #11

Very easily. clementine613 Mar 2017 #16

Yes but I think their opinion should pull some weight with those who can nt doc03 Mar 2017 #18

It should... clementine613 Mar 2017 #25

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #78

I don't trust Bipartisan Report Dem2 Mar 2017 #12

Bipartisan Report is a pro-liberal, clickbait news outlet, Ptah Mar 2017 #13

I'm really tired of fake/skewed "news" from both sides. I've been fact checking on right wing Hoyt Mar 2017 #57

WOO HOO!!!! YES!!!! Sculpin Beauregard Mar 2017 #14

Don't get excited. It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #79

The article cited is a sensationalistic rendering of Tanuki Mar 2017 #15

Bad source inaccurate headline - please delete or edit bettyellen Mar 2017 #17

Yes...it should be corrected or deleted. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #51

Reading is fundamental. RedWedge Mar 2017 #19

All eight?! sheshe2 Mar 2017 #20

No Bradical79 Mar 2017 #32

Link to Think Progress which seems to be the article discussed here: MelissaB Mar 2017 #21

Sorry, but I am not believing that dumbcat Mar 2017 #23

This is a seriously misleading crap headline. tammywammy Mar 2017 #24

Do you find bipartisanreport . com to be a reliable source? n/t sl8 Mar 2017 #26

Needs corroboration from other news outlets like NYT AJT Mar 2017 #27

Nice thought, but justices don't have a say & site isn't credible Panich52 Mar 2017 #28

liars BuddyCa Mar 2017 #29

Bullshit. nt Codeine Mar 2017 #30

Not true Bradical79 Mar 2017 #31

The story is bogus, and it shouldn't be here. lapucelle Mar 2017 #33

This is foolish if, as appears, it is based on a recent decision reached by the Court, elleng Mar 2017 #34

Sorry - all of you who are objecting to the headline and the source Mira Mar 2017 #36

No worries. hrmjustin Mar 2017 #37

U could delete it! Cryptoad Mar 2017 #44

True dat. nt Honeycombe8 Mar 2017 #52

So delete it or change the title. KittyWampus Mar 2017 #55

So delete it. n/t demmiblue Mar 2017 #62

Could you delete so thread will be locked? Crunchy Frog Mar 2017 #63

I got really excited when I read it too and immediately sent to some friends...from whom Amaryllis Mar 2017 #66

Well,shooot! I'm disappointed. furtheradu Mar 2017 #67

Can you please go back and edit it - or delete it. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #80

That headline is extremely misleading. We have so much bullshit to deal with enough Mar 2017 #38

This is a bizarre characterization of a SCOTUS opinion that was issued last week... Princess Turandot Mar 2017 #40

This is a blatantly false article BainsBane Mar 2017 #41

Fake as fake can be HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #47

Didn't see that coming...... joanbarnes Mar 2017 #43

It isn't coming BainsBane Mar 2017 #45

This is BIG. Equinox Moon Mar 2017 #48

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #82

Excellent!!! RESIST!!!!!! Initech Mar 2017 #49

It's fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #84

K&R... spanone Mar 2017 #53

LOL! This is IN YOUR FACE FAKE NEWS! Vinnie From Indy Mar 2017 #56

Not just in, and no stand was taken per se. truebluegreen Mar 2017 #58

ADMINS... we DO need an option for fake news regarding jury duty! demmiblue Mar 2017 #59

I alerted as a conspiracy theory - the closest category to fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #86

Check your discredited source. This isn't a trustworthy website. procon Mar 2017 #60

Obvious Fake News is Chitown Kev Mar 2017 #61

I had to check to make sure this wasn't the Onion. This is unbelievable and probably... George II Mar 2017 #64

Not from the onion, but it is fake news. Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #85

Stop with the fake news! Ms. Toad Mar 2017 #69

Why is this bullshit posted here? onenote Mar 2017 #81

No. All 8 Justices recently overturned a single opinion of Gorsuch. That is all -- no letter pnwmom Mar 2017 #83

Title should be changed... LenaBaby61 Mar 2017 #87