Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

TrollBuster9090

(6,130 posts)

3. It would be nice if this version is true. Not because it would bring down the Trump gang

Reply to womanofthehills (Original post)

Tue Mar 28, 2017, 04:46 AM

Mar 2017

(and many might think that was reason enough!) ...but because, if this version is true, it might finally put some bipartisan steam behind the effort to get f-ing DARK MONEY out of elections!

It's disgusting that there are people out there who don't care if their elections are bought by DOMESTIC plutocrats, crooks, and robber-barons. But most of those people at least CLAIM to be against having their elections bought by FOREIGN plutocrats, crooks, and robber-barons.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Kushner and Trump: Taped At Secret Trump Tower Meetings With Russians - SPECULATION by L.Mensch [View all] womanofthehills Mar 2017 OP

Thanks for the link. It will be interesting to see how well she connected the dots as things Lucinda Mar 2017 #1

THIS: "... it was about Russian money being funneled into the Trump campaign...." L. Coyote Mar 2017 #8

The amount that doesn't need to be reported is $50. brooklynite Mar 2017 #13

Money transfers amount is $10,000 or more must be reported by bank, 9,999.99 not required. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #17

That has to do with money transfers in general...not funds to a political campaign. brooklynite Mar 2017 #18

Who said money was going to a political campaign? KittyWampus Mar 2017 #22

The person I replied to? brooklynite Mar 2017 #24

That seems quite logical... 61 minutes does seems like a definite attempt to avoid Lucinda Mar 2017 #14

Fascinating and informed speculation PJMcK Mar 2017 #2

Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #10

I wonder about reason trump started cyber-lynching Obama. It came after the order to preserve docs. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #20

It would be nice if this version is true. Not because it would bring down the Trump gang TrollBuster9090 Mar 2017 #3

LM is saying that Trump Tower was under surveillance during the campaign? HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #4

The surveillance was on the Russian ambassador apparently, spies spying on spies. L. Coyote Mar 2017 #6

The Wire Season 6 HoneyBadger Mar 2017 #21

Trump himself was not under suveillance leftynyc Mar 2017 #12

Makes sense to me. InAbLuEsTaTe Mar 2017 #5

Michael Ellis was House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Special Counsel, Nunes' lawyer L. Coyote Mar 2017 #7

Who need a special prosecutor when we have Twitter? L. Coyote Mar 2017 #9

#TrumpRussia 50 tweet MEGA-THREAD by Seth Abramson L. Coyote Mar 2017 #11

Rep Adam Schiff is Trump's Worst Nightmare: A Prosecutor Who Has Taken Down A Kremlin Spy L. Coyote Mar 2017 #15

Mensch has been outstanding NewJeffCT Mar 2017 #16

So not Mark Levin? Not Fox news? But trump team on tape from meets at trump tower? jmg257 Mar 2017 #19

Malcolm Nance tweet this morning womanofthehills Mar 2017 #23