Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
10. My German is fairly good, but I'm too tired to translate tonight.
Fri Dec 30, 2011, 03:52 AM
Dec 2011

Gerda Hensel, a 90-year-old in Zehdenick, Germany requested that the court appoint a guardian who would assist her with her affairs should she become incompetent.

A psychiatrist has examined her, but the court has not reached its decision. In other words, her competency case is pending.

The bank claims that by refusing to release her money to her, it is protecting her. In addition, the bank would be violating legal procedures if it released the money.

But Ms. Hensel and her caretaker (also referred to as her companion) disagree. The companion claims that Ms. Hensel is deaf but not incompetent.

So Ms. Hensel and her friend are occupying the bank. That is they are standing at the door of the bank with a sign that they brought with them saying (and I'm translating very freely so that it makes sense in English), "Scandal (or shameful conduct) in Germany. The bank refuses to pay me my money."

Hope this helps. I think the bank is doing the right thing here.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»90 year-old occupies bank...»Reply #10