Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ProudLib72

(17,984 posts)

1. Doesn't this statement go against what intelligence said?

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Thu Mar 30, 2017, 09:46 PM

Mar 2017

“Candidly, while it helped one candidate this time, they are not favoring one party over another,” Warner said, “and, consequently, should be a concern for all of us.”

I kind of understand why he might say this, but it doesn't seem like a good idea to contradict intelligence.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Analysis Heres what weve learned from the Senate hearing on Russia so far [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2017 OP

Doesn't this statement go against what intelligence said? ProudLib72 Mar 2017 #1

Supposedly Rubio was targeted Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2017 #2

Ah ha! That makes a little more sense now ProudLib72 Mar 2017 #3