Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Can the President still say that the mandate is not a "tax"?? [View all]zbdent
(35,392 posts)34. "Its positive attributes can be touted." - in today's "liberally-biased media"???
Mitch McConnell & company appear to be the President, not Obama. They get daily press conferences when they want to attack Obama or whichever Dem makes a minor faux pas, all the while ignoring Romney's "I like to fire people" statement.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
134 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think that calling it a "Pyrrhic" victory means that it may have a negative effect
razorman
Jul 2012
#25
You have a point. Of course, both sides will try to "spin" to their best advantage.
razorman
Jul 2012
#134
"Its positive attributes can be touted." - in today's "liberally-biased media"???
zbdent
Jul 2012
#34
If I don't get health insurance and pay the tax what do I get? You just stated:
kelly1mm
Jul 2012
#39
No, I don't get a health insurance policy by paying the tax. By definition you only pay the tax if
kelly1mm
Jul 2012
#74
The President won the battle for legislation he tacked his presidency on, but Roberts gave...
Poll_Blind
Jul 2012
#5
Some legal scholars suggest Roberts produced an essentially conservative opinion with a...
Poll_Blind
Jul 2012
#17
It is a penalty affecting a small number of people who could afford to buy health insurance but
Skidmore
Jul 2012
#10
The Mandate isn't a tax. The Penalty is. If you follow the law, you incur no tax.
MjolnirTime
Jul 2012
#13
Again, while five Justices said it was constitutional, only one said it was a tax.
Nye Bevan
Jul 2012
#37
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." A tax by any other name would smell as...
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jul 2012
#31
I think Dems best response is - "Huge tax increase"? Fearmongering hyperbole. Check the facts...
pinto
Jul 2012
#35
You are a brave person; your op is spot on (if it looks like a tax, quacks like a tax, and walks
sad sally
Jul 2012
#70
It's regressive in that a .001% upper income will pay the same as a 10% upper income..
Fumesucker
Jul 2012
#77
A sovereign currency government does not need to increase taxes to spend.
girl gone mad
Jul 2012
#100
But then, it would have failed and you would have something else to complain about.
kentuck
Jul 2012
#81
he says that IF they view it as a tax, they have an obligation to leave the law alone
bigtree
Jul 2012
#88
There's a difference between a tax, and a penalty imposed under the authority to tax
markpkessinger
Jul 2012
#91
What is at issue now is not what the Solicitor argued, but what the Court actually held n/t
markpkessinger
Jul 2012
#97
In other words, would it have been better to have the entire bill declared unconstitutional?
kentuck
Jul 2012
#101
I don't understand by people want to echo the current RW talk radio rant about "new taxes"...
NYC_SKP
Jul 2012
#133
Hey, why don't you just take it up with Nancy Pelosi, who used the term last week?
NYC_SKP
Jul 2012
#132