Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zbdent

(35,392 posts)
34. "Its positive attributes can be touted." - in today's "liberally-biased media"???
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 12:17 PM
Jul 2012

Mitch McConnell & company appear to be the President, not Obama. They get daily press conferences when they want to attack Obama or whichever Dem makes a minor faux pas, all the while ignoring Romney's "I like to fire people" statement.

How can it be Pyrrhic when the ACA stays in effect? treestar Jul 2012 #1
The Chief Justice ruled that it was constitutional only because... kentuck Jul 2012 #6
Except when this gets out BumRushDaShow Jul 2012 #7
I'm going to find that link and save it to my phone... Volaris Jul 2012 #64
A Pyrrhic victory is one in name only treestar Jul 2012 #18
I think that calling it a "Pyrrhic" victory means that it may have a negative effect razorman Jul 2012 #25
There are many issues to campaign on treestar Jul 2012 #41
You have a point. Of course, both sides will try to "spin" to their best advantage. razorman Jul 2012 #134
"Its positive attributes can be touted." - in today's "liberally-biased media"??? zbdent Jul 2012 #34
No argument from me on the media carrying water for Rs treestar Jul 2012 #42
Well Dems really need to start touting loudly and often. n/t Beartracks Jul 2012 #76
If I don't get health insurance and pay the tax what do I get? You just stated: kelly1mm Jul 2012 #39
A health insurance policy? treestar Jul 2012 #72
No, I don't get a health insurance policy by paying the tax. By definition you only pay the tax if kelly1mm Jul 2012 #74
Then get the insurance policy treestar Jul 2012 #109
This is the first I've heard of the catastrophic loss coverage. drm604 Jul 2012 #106
that is what insurance policies are for! treestar Jul 2012 #110
I understand what insurance policies are for. I'm not stupid. drm604 Jul 2012 #111
The only people who will pay the penalty are treestar Jul 2012 #114
I understand that. drm604 Jul 2012 #116
No, paying the penalty would mean no coverage treestar Jul 2012 #124
It's a tax on a behavior? girl gone mad Jul 2012 #62
Well, that's what the Court said treestar Jul 2012 #71
If you can't afford it, government subsidies are available. drm604 Jul 2012 #104
One Justice says it is a tax Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #2
Explain tax break for 99 percent Broderick Jul 2012 #3
Actually, it's projected to be 98% Wounded Bear Jul 2012 #9
That seems like an unrealistic projection. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #63
The tax/penalty will only be on 1 or 2 percent of the population. Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #16
Well that might go higher as people drop coverages. Broderick Jul 2012 #30
Have you tried the Wa Po calculator? Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #40
thanks for the link Broderick Jul 2012 #125
How can they possibly project those percentages? B2G Jul 2012 #46
That is the rate in MA where they have a similar system. Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #55
Good points. kentuck Jul 2012 #8
I don't think he can, and along those lines hughee99 Jul 2012 #4
The decision says it is not a penalty treestar Jul 2012 #45
The President won the battle for legislation he tacked his presidency on, but Roberts gave... Poll_Blind Jul 2012 #5
"There's a certain type of diabolic brilliance..." kentuck Jul 2012 #12
Some legal scholars suggest Roberts produced an essentially conservative opinion with a... Poll_Blind Jul 2012 #17
Thanks PB! kentuck Jul 2012 #28
It is a penalty affecting a small number of people who could afford to buy health insurance but Skidmore Jul 2012 #10
The IRS does not administer DMV fines. David__77 Jul 2012 #105
This tax is going to impact the middle class the most B2G Jul 2012 #11
Bullshit. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #58
Bull. The middle class can afford insurance Arkana Jul 2012 #117
The Mandate isn't a tax. The Penalty is. If you follow the law, you incur no tax. MjolnirTime Jul 2012 #13
Good description n/t ChazII Jul 2012 #68
Because one out of the nine Justices says it's a tax, Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #14
Because he wrote the majority opinion... kentuck Jul 2012 #15
That was still only his opinion. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #19
So the President can say that it is only CJ Roberts' decision? kentuck Jul 2012 #22
Yep. Five Justices said ACA was fine, Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #33
But it ProSense Jul 2012 #21
Interesting that Roberts may be too clever by half... kentuck Jul 2012 #24
Democrats ProSense Jul 2012 #27
I would agree but still... kentuck Jul 2012 #29
To add... rufus dog Jul 2012 #32
The Chief Justice based his decision on the White House's own arguments. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #65
The Solicitor General argued before the SCOTUS that it was a tax zoechen Jul 2012 #20
Thanks for the clarification... kentuck Jul 2012 #26
The spin will be interesting 4th law of robotics Jul 2012 #23
Again, while five Justices said it was constitutional, only one said it was a tax. Nye Bevan Jul 2012 #37
"A rose by any other name would smell as sweet." A tax by any other name would smell as... Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2012 #31
I think Dems best response is - "Huge tax increase"? Fearmongering hyperbole. Check the facts... pinto Jul 2012 #35
It is a tax and your health insurance premiums are now taxes. dkf Jul 2012 #36
Insurance premiums are NOT taxes B2G Jul 2012 #44
We didn't choose. The government forced us to buy it. dkf Jul 2012 #53
Got it...and I agree B2G Jul 2012 #54
+1 Poll_Blind Jul 2012 #59
You aren't forced to buy anything. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #60
He can, he is and he will. lonestarnot Jul 2012 #38
Whatever they call it, 40 millon uninsured will now be covered still_one Jul 2012 #43
It's all about informing people about how they will save $ flamingdem Jul 2012 #50
17 million were supposed to be covered under expansion of Medicaid. dkf Jul 2012 #56
Ask Romney. nt BootinUp Jul 2012 #47
I stand by Justice Ginsburg ashling Jul 2012 #48
To your final question .... The people who now get coverage won. JoePhilly Jul 2012 #49
Why are you looking gift horse in the mouth. pennylane100 Jul 2012 #51
Simply stated. kentuck Jul 2012 #52
I support fair taxation. Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #57
No. I think taxes are necessary for the society that we want. kentuck Jul 2012 #61
You are a brave person; your op is spot on (if it looks like a tax, quacks like a tax, and walks sad sally Jul 2012 #70
This is a very regressive tax. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #67
why is it regressive? Warren Stupidity Jul 2012 #69
It's regressive in that a .001% upper income will pay the same as a 10% upper income.. Fumesucker Jul 2012 #77
They say that anyway, truth be damned. PotatoChip Jul 2012 #66
It's like a cigarette tax Life Long Dem Jul 2012 #73
And the Repubs are now saying... kentuck Jul 2012 #75
why are you ignoring the interpretations of the other affirming Justices bigtree Jul 2012 #80
Yes it's a tax. So what? bluestateguy Jul 2012 #78
Absolutely right. kentuck Jul 2012 #85
A sovereign currency government does not need to increase taxes to spend. girl gone mad Jul 2012 #100
why can't he refer to more than just the one Justice who claims it's a tax? bigtree Jul 2012 #79
But then, it would have failed and you would have something else to complain about. kentuck Jul 2012 #81
I don't understand why is this such a problem to understand. zoechen Jul 2012 #83
It was not just "one Justice". former9thward Jul 2012 #82
Must have been a very persuasive argument? kentuck Jul 2012 #84
It is about one word zoechen Jul 2012 #87
he says that IF they view it as a tax, they have an obligation to leave the law alone bigtree Jul 2012 #88
So I don't understand what you point is zoechen Jul 2012 #89
so the Justices that didn't recognize the tax argument were just swiss cheese? bigtree Jul 2012 #90
The fact of the matter is zoechen Jul 2012 #92
I think you are right. kentuck Jul 2012 #94
that doesn't make the tax element some overriding part of the mandate bigtree Jul 2012 #98
It says it (taxation) was the "heart" of his argument. former9thward Jul 2012 #118
it affects about2% of the population, mostly affluent folks opting out bigtree Jul 2012 #121
So Obama's lawyer lied to the court. former9thward Jul 2012 #122
no, that's just a distortion of what was said and the facts of the law bigtree Jul 2012 #128
social security and medicare are mandated taxes madrchsod Jul 2012 #86
There's a difference between a tax, and a penalty imposed under the authority to tax markpkessinger Jul 2012 #91
The administrations own Council General argued zoechen Jul 2012 #93
If they had not made that argument... kentuck Jul 2012 #95
That's what I'm saying zoechen Jul 2012 #96
What is at issue now is not what the Solicitor argued, but what the Court actually held n/t markpkessinger Jul 2012 #97
Ok zoechen Jul 2012 #99
In other words, would it have been better to have the entire bill declared unconstitutional? kentuck Jul 2012 #101
I agree zoechen Jul 2012 #102
The Solicitor made two parallel arguments . . . markpkessinger Jul 2012 #107
Right, I have already commented on this before zoechen Jul 2012 #108
Well, it is a "tax" by all reasonable measures... David__77 Jul 2012 #103
It's a penalty paid as a tax.... soccer1 Jul 2012 #115
No, it's not a tax, it's a .... soccer1 Jul 2012 #130
the supreme court confirmed that he can call it whatever he wants. unblock Jul 2012 #112
Nnnnnnope cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #113
No. n/t lumberjack_jeff Jul 2012 #119
Romney agrees with the President... kentuck Jul 2012 #120
yes. it is a penalty. spanone Jul 2012 #123
Pyrrhic? Not in the slightest. It ENERGIZED Obama, if anything. MADem Jul 2012 #126
It is not a tax; it is a penalty to be paid only by free-riders. NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #127
tell em bigtree Jul 2012 #129
I don't understand by people want to echo the current RW talk radio rant about "new taxes"... NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #133
"penalty to be paid only by free-riders" girl gone mad Jul 2012 #131
Hey, why don't you just take it up with Nancy Pelosi, who used the term last week? NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #132
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can the President still s...»Reply #34