Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I have a name for all this unpleasantness [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)21. My last reply to you (Wed) AGREED WITH YOU. You're thinking someone else. Your accusations false.
DU is the only political site I post on. You have confused me with someone else.
I would appreciate it if you would stop harrassing me...and I do remember
your posts from another site by the way. I said if both Trump and Pence are compromised...and resign around the same time...then Ryan will be next in line...and that is not false...in any way. It is completely true.
your posts from another site by the way. I said if both Trump and Pence are compromised...and resign around the same time...then Ryan will be next in line...and that is not false...in any way. It is completely true.
You can take this to DU mail if you like, but you are completely wrong about me. I'm not demanding an apology, but one would be appreciated.
1) I'm not harassing you.
2) This is the only political site I post on. This is the only site I post on with this name. What other site? Name it and name the screen name. I have no idea what other sites you post on.
3) I couldn't remember responding to Demsrule86 other than this thread. But by checking my posts one by one (time consuming) all the way back five days ago (I stop looking when I got into Sunday) I found one out of 170 posts. [font size = "+1"]The last thread I responded to you I agreed with you[/font] and you replied agreeing with me. I wrote:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=8868589
Trump Slump coming. Tourism industry was the bleeding edge. Takes time to ripple through economy.
A month ago, tourism bookings or searches (sorry, not sure which) were down over 6% already.
Tour operators won't need as many vehicles and can't afford to buy as many family cars.
So it goes.
A month ago, tourism bookings or searches (sorry, not sure which) were down over 6% already.
Tour operators won't need as many vehicles and can't afford to buy as many family cars.
So it goes.
which I wrote agreeing with your Original Post:
Just wanted to post this.I have a been an auto workers wife for years. We are headed for recession.
Hubs is an engineer. He retired early and now has a job that makes parts for autos but other things as well...My son went into the autos on the line ...never really liked school. He is very smart though. He was laid off in Ohio in February...car not selling. He got a different job still in Ohio about an hour away, he got laid off before his start day. I have seen this before. Autos always signal the beginning of recession...and they are the first to signal when it is over...batton down the hatches and get ready we are headed for recession with the GOP in charge God help us. Good luck.
Hubs is an engineer. He retired early and now has a job that makes parts for autos but other things as well...My son went into the autos on the line ...never really liked school. He is very smart though. He was laid off in Ohio in February...car not selling. He got a different job still in Ohio about an hour away, he got laid off before his start day. I have seen this before. Autos always signal the beginning of recession...and they are the first to signal when it is over...batton down the hatches and get ready we are headed for recession with the GOP in charge God help us. Good luck.
You agreed with my reply by posting:
Tourism...is where people rent cars ...
and rental agents buy cars...the fleet sales have dried up.
and rental agents buy cars...the fleet sales have dried up.
How is mutual agreement harassment?
4) As to this thread, your post was not clear and was very terse. So I clarified it with neutral language, not making any assertions about you, not even referring to you. Then you claimed you knew how it worked and restated the predicate from your unclear post which was an ineffective way to clarify it. So I pointed that out and now you are here claiming you said "and resign around the same time" which you did not say. If you don't want to have posters provide information and background to help clarify posts, then please write more clearly even if it means writing more words.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
21 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well I was assuming that there is enough dirt on Pence that he would resign...I am aware how
Demsrule86
Mar 2017
#11
Since you are aware, then you know your original assertion is false.
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2017
#14
My last reply to you (Wed) AGREED WITH YOU. You're thinking someone else. Your accusations false.
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2017
#21
Hmm, the timing could work like that. Or maybe the Repubs just rush approve the new VP & they go up.
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2017
#17