General Discussion

davepdx

(228 posts)

20. Those will be extremely tough choices and will vary from state to state.

Sun Jul 1, 2012, 02:33 PM

Jul 2012

I suspect that there will probably need to be a combinations of cuts and new sources of revenue. I have no definitive answer for your question. I was merely trying to make the point that the Medicare/Medicaid expert made that in these states (that refuse the federal funds) when the gravely ill come into the emergency rooms they are going to have to be treated. Emergency Room treatment is, in general, the most expensive type of treatment. The hospitals will have to treat them, absorb the cost and the hospitals would then end up driving the state legislatures into action.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

39 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Reluctance in Some States Over Medicaid Expansion [View all] dkf Jul 2012 OP

Reluctance? pRick Scott in Florida said, screw you we aint doin it NightWatcher Jul 2012 #1

No state will raise taxes to support expanded Medicaid. banned from Kos Jul 2012 #2

I know that I have a very dim view on most Americans Ruby the Liberal Jul 2012 #3

Good points. pinto Jul 2012 #5

They should have kept it at 100%. dkf Jul 2012 #6

This was Roberts' poison pill. n/t EFerrari Jul 2012 #14

Yep, and it potentially reaches far beyond Medicaid SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #21

Gov. Dave Heineman of Nebraska (R) calls it "unfunded". Doesn't expansion include Fed block grants pinto Jul 2012 #4

This is where Dems, POTUS, Sebelius must step in, NOW, elleng Jul 2012 #8

The bill is written assuming the expansion of Medicaid will cover most up to 133% of poverty level, PoliticAverse Jul 2012 #16

Thought so. elleng Jul 2012 #18

In the end 10% is left to the states to cover. dkf Jul 2012 #9

I'd like to see estimates of what that 10% is expected to cover. Children already get Medicaid, pinto Jul 2012 #10

Medicaid expansion map by state... PoliticAverse Jul 2012 #23

Thanks. pinto Jul 2012 #32

Nice map....note on my state, Washington... Wounded Bear Jul 2012 #36

let the red state voters demand health care from the people they elected.... msongs Jul 2012 #7

Judging from the map above, there were quite a few Fawke Em Jul 2012 #34

The states that are objecting already have terrible Medicaid programs. MineralMan Jul 2012 #11

Run ads in those states. kentuck Jul 2012 #12

Tennessee here... and I already saw an ad. Fawke Em Jul 2012 #31

On Saturday's "Up with Chris Hayes" I saw a different perspective davepdx Jul 2012 #13

What should the states cut out of their budgets to pay for their portion? n/t SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #15

In Kansas, corporations pay no taxes proud2BlibKansan Jul 2012 #17

Those will be extremely tough choices and will vary from state to state. davepdx Jul 2012 #20

I agree 100% SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #27

I wonder how much they can effectively raise rates though? davepdx Jul 2012 #30

Reluctance my ass. They are in open defiance, saying they REFUSE. kestrel91316 Jul 2012 #19

Right, has nothing to do with 'reluctance' for financial reasons, elleng Jul 2012 #22

I agree that finances are probably not the primary reason SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #24

That's the teaser rate. They should have kept it 100%. dkf Jul 2012 #26

Wouldn't matter to the haters, elleng Jul 2012 #28

The economy isn't going to recover very strongly. dkf Jul 2012 #33

Yes but I said 'down the road,' elleng Jul 2012 #37

They are about to change the way states account for pensions. dkf Jul 2012 #38

If you're speaking of the Medicaid expansion I wouldn't call it defiance SickOfTheOnePct Jul 2012 #25

Defying logic, reason, and the best interests of their constuents. elleng Jul 2012 #29

They're afraid it will start working and work so well Fawke Em Jul 2012 #35

Howard Dean: It's 'gubernatorial malpractice' not to accept Medicaid funds Life Long Dem Jul 2012 #39