Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
7. For comparison: fuel taxes go to the government, which in turn pays out to private construction firm
Sun Jul 1, 2012, 02:46 PM
Jul 2012

Sure, there's also state agencies (CalTrans in California), but also Teichert and other contractors, and all the concrete and steel and asphalt corporations.

If the government is collecting a tax that eventually goes to cover others' costs and if some of those costs are private, well I don't see much difference.

What I LOVE about this plan is that it keeps the onus on the states to develop plans, which leads the way to states individually developing single payer programs, if they choose to, which is probably the more likely route to a nationwide universal health program.

Cheers!

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»But the ACA ain't really ...»Reply #7