Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: McCaskill is a no on Gorsuch. [View all]Cha
(320,270 posts)48. Every bit helps.. Mahalo for doing that, DFW!
I didn't "crucify" her.. I just said..
Star Member Cha (195,615 posts)
84. Remember Garland, Claire.. and just how popular is
trump now?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1743411
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
48 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If McCaskill is going to support the filibuster it appears Schumer does in fact have the 41
PoliticAverse
Mar 2017
#4
With or without a filibuster the republicans have the majority right now and you know he's gettin'in
caroldansen
Mar 2017
#5
We will not cooperate with the orange liar except for a very very good reason...and he and the
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#42
um, and tell me why they wouldn't just do it when it came time to replace Ginsburg?
JCanete
Mar 2017
#12
but if you dont' use the filibuster it won't be there, and if you use it, you say they are going to
JCanete
Mar 2017
#17
given the history, why would we trust that deal? We give up front, they give nothing nt
JCanete
Mar 2017
#25
is that your experience with republicans giving their word? Does anything ever stick?
JCanete
Mar 2017
#35
absolutely, why should we just let them do it without at least registering our opposition. nt
JCanete
Mar 2017
#26
Again, when they do it then, why will it matter that we held onto it now. You didn't convince me
JCanete
Mar 2017
#33
Ginsburg is still healthy and strong..life expectancy is 99...75% chance of living to 92.
lostnfound
Apr 2017
#40
The Democrats should not allow any SC justice nominee to go through until the Russian connections
still_one
Mar 2017
#13
I must say I'm surprised. I thought she'd line up with the anti-filibuster folks,
Buns_of_Fire
Mar 2017
#20
We need to send money even if we don't live in her state to help her keep her seat...they
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#46