Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)

13. It's a penalty under the tax code. No one will be taxed.

Reply to truedelphi (Original post)

Sun Jul 1, 2012, 04:14 PM

Jul 2012

If you are under a certain income you will not pay the penalty but actually receive help getting health care with a tax break. It's associated with the tax code in that respect.

The Supreme Court could not use the Commerce Clause for justification but found it justified under the Tax Clause. Just because something is found legally justified under a legal clause doesn't mean it inherits the title of that clause.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

But the ACA ain't really a tax, is it? [View all] truedelphi Jul 2012 OP

It's funny watching people around here resort to right-wing talking points to bash the ACA. TheWraith Jul 2012 #1

This message was self-deleted by its author SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #2

Actaully, stop and think about it for a second. truedelphi Jul 2012 #4

Either it's a tax or it's unconstitutional. Take your pick. dkf Jul 2012 #8

unless it is Constitutional under the Commerce Clause Motown_Johnny Jul 2012 #16

What's been done is done. Commerce clause isnt what it used to be. dkf Jul 2012 #18

I think you may be SunsetDreams Jul 2012 #3

But again, if it is a tax, even after the mandate date is enforceable, truedelphi Jul 2012 #6

The money you pay for Health Insurance ashling Jul 2012 #5

For comparison: fuel taxes go to the government, which in turn pays out to private construction firm NYC_SKP Jul 2012 #7

However, consider the blowback that may occur: truedelphi Jul 2012 #11

It has been upheld as constitutional because it can be read to be a tax: treestar Jul 2012 #9

None of that addresses my discomfort over the truedelphi Jul 2012 #12

The Court held no such thing treestar Jul 2012 #17

The penalty for not purchasing the insurance is the tax. Bolo Boffin Jul 2012 #10

It's a penalty under the tax code. No one will be taxed. Lint Head Jul 2012 #13

In any event, check out truedelphi Jul 2012 #14

it sounds like a fine to me mitchtv Jul 2012 #15