General Discussion

Tom Rinaldo

(23,187 posts)

37. Probably tasty too I bet :) n/t

Reply to brooklynite (Reply #24)

Mon Apr 3, 2017, 07:01 PM

Apr 2017

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

66 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

**AND** they fucked with our voting machines... [View all] LaydeeBug Apr 2017 OP

Until Americans wake up and go public on this reality malaise Apr 2017 #1

And yet neither the GOP or the Russians took that route Hortensis Apr 2017 #16

Sing it! 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2017 #2

it is interesting how little play this story has gotten this cycle unblock Apr 2017 #3

This message was self-deleted by its author Amishman Apr 2017 #7

They hacked voter registrations and then didn't do anything triron Apr 2017 #14

right. if you believe the msm, then all they did with that data unblock Apr 2017 #28

K&R Blue_Roses Apr 2017 #4

And again failed to offer even the slightest evidence mythology Apr 2017 #5

And of course you know that a sampling of hand recounts in a sample of cunties does not a hand LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #8

Back door Bear Creek Apr 2017 #41

Cheat sheet to make the hand count match Bear Creek Apr 2017 #42

you have absolutely no evidence that it DIDN'T happen; admit it. and if you don't recognize TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #45

Both those arguments make no sense. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #53

you completely ignored everything i wrote; anyway, if you wish to be a faith-based voter, TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #55

amen!!!! LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #61

The suspected counties DID NOT hand count - judge ruled against it. ElementaryPenguin Apr 2017 #65

Yup. I think so too. Maven Apr 2017 #6

Maybe because feeding fake news stories to gullible voters is perfectly legal? brooklynite Apr 2017 #10

Fake news is sure popular on DU these days. cwydro Apr 2017 #22

I CAN make risotto...that doesn't mean (absent evidence) that I DID. brooklynite Apr 2017 #9

Sure, but if you work at an unsanitary restaurant you shouldn't be allowed to cook Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #20

The proper maintenance and protection of voting machines has nothing to do... brooklynite Apr 2017 #24

Probably tasty too I bet :) n/t Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #37

As Jon Podesta says, you have to add the loquid slowly... brooklynite Apr 2017 #38

Thank you for this. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #39

precisely; this shouldn't even have to be stated. some people are either naive, uninformed, or TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #46

Not this again Amishman Apr 2017 #11

The Russians had guys with screwdrivers and jmg257 Apr 2017 #27

When switching 40,000 votes reverses the electioral college, your numberrs FAIL. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #31

Look, it's even easier than this..... Glitterati Apr 2017 #12

exactly. sarah FAILIN Apr 2017 #32

Yes, and in a micro targeted area or areas. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #40

correct; this is an important point. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #47

If votes cannot be verified in recounts or physical evidence there is no fair vote. The Wielding Truth Apr 2017 #13

absolutely this. And the pretense of "concerted efforts were made everywhere else, but LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #17

not even in recounts; they must be counted by hand/eye the FIRST TIME. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #56

They tried. jeanmarc Apr 2017 #15

Prove it. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #18

Keep digging you'll get some real proof eventually jmg257 Apr 2017 #19

The article doesn't say what your OP declares. You can post this crap forever KittyWampus Apr 2017 #21

That article dates back to August and provides no proof that electronic voter fraud happened. briv1016 Apr 2017 #23

Why hack machines when it's so much easier to hack the data? crosinski Apr 2017 #25

Supposedly they're not connected to the net... jmg257 Apr 2017 #29

25 states use machines with the capability to connect to the internet, though it isn't clear pnwmom Apr 2017 #59

no doubt there are multiple ways the results could be manipulated. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #48

This thread proves 1 thing to me Alea Apr 2017 #26

If you don't KNOW that the Russians would have hacked the vote totals if they could have... TheDebbieDee Apr 2017 #30

Welcome to DU, Alea!! Do you mind if I ask how old you are? StevieM Apr 2017 #33

The "both sides" is a bullshit rw talking point. If you honestly think... NightWatcher Apr 2017 #34

wow Alea Apr 2017 #35

My reply wasn't about dems or reps Alea Apr 2017 #43

Times are tense, Alea. Sorry you got unfairly roughed up in this thread. StevieM Apr 2017 #57

Welcome Back! nt RandiFan1290 Apr 2017 #63

That poster didn't even come CLOSE to saying Hillary would've been just like Trump. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #44

That's false - I've seen multiple fake news stories from Liberal sources. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #54

You need to do more research. There is no reason to feel confidence that the Russians pnwmom Apr 2017 #58

thank you. bookmarked. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #62

this should be an issue... stillcool Apr 2017 #36

there *is* a reason; the PTB like the current fraudulent, hackable system. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #49

Republicans let them do it Achilleaze Apr 2017 #50

The hackers admitted as much flamingdem Apr 2017 #51

I have felt this from the beginning cilla4progress Apr 2017 #52

So your claiming that "they" physically picked the locks of voting machines Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #60

That'd be "you're" for starters. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #66

I agree, LB - and believe this will ultimately be revealed ElementaryPenguin Apr 2017 #64