Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
58. You need to do more research. There is no reason to feel confidence that the Russians
Tue Apr 4, 2017, 05:55 AM
Apr 2017

didn't hack the vote in at least some key states.

The Obama administration was well aware of the risk but got pushback from some of the states, who thought they didn't need any help making the voting process more secure.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028890363

https://www.yahoo.com/tech/critical-discovery-during-wisconsin-recount-cellular-connectivity-tabulators-131700727.html

A cellular capability is available as an option on the latest Election Systems and Software (ES&S) DS200 model of optical scanner.

SNIP

Cellular wireless connections can not only link directly with the internet, but they are built to have a longer range and be harder to detect than regular Wi-Fi networks. There is universal agreement among computer professionals that anything connected to the internet is hackable.

When FBI Director James Comey told the public, and Congress specifically, that none of our election equipment is connected to the internet, perhaps he was unaware of these connections or did not fully understand their implications. It is possible that no government agency ever examined, tested or certified this newest equipment.

There are currently over 26,500 ES&S DS200 optical scan vote-counting machines in 25 states. It is not yet known how many of them have the cellular capability at present, nor whether other equipment models have the same or similar capabilities. DS200 scanners count ballots electronically; ballots are fed in by hand but are counted by a computer inside in accordance with programmable instructions.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Until Americans wake up and go public on this reality malaise Apr 2017 #1
And yet neither the GOP or the Russians took that route Hortensis Apr 2017 #16
Sing it! 50 Shades Of Blue Apr 2017 #2
it is interesting how little play this story has gotten this cycle unblock Apr 2017 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Amishman Apr 2017 #7
They hacked voter registrations and then didn't do anything triron Apr 2017 #14
right. if you believe the msm, then all they did with that data unblock Apr 2017 #28
K&R Blue_Roses Apr 2017 #4
And again failed to offer even the slightest evidence mythology Apr 2017 #5
And of course you know that a sampling of hand recounts in a sample of cunties does not a hand LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #8
Back door Bear Creek Apr 2017 #41
Cheat sheet to make the hand count match Bear Creek Apr 2017 #42
you have absolutely no evidence that it DIDN'T happen; admit it. and if you don't recognize TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #45
Both those arguments make no sense. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #53
you completely ignored everything i wrote; anyway, if you wish to be a faith-based voter, TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #55
amen!!!! LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #61
The suspected counties DID NOT hand count - judge ruled against it. ElementaryPenguin Apr 2017 #65
Yup. I think so too. Maven Apr 2017 #6
Maybe because feeding fake news stories to gullible voters is perfectly legal? brooklynite Apr 2017 #10
Fake news is sure popular on DU these days. cwydro Apr 2017 #22
I CAN make risotto...that doesn't mean (absent evidence) that I DID. brooklynite Apr 2017 #9
Sure, but if you work at an unsanitary restaurant you shouldn't be allowed to cook Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #20
The proper maintenance and protection of voting machines has nothing to do... brooklynite Apr 2017 #24
Probably tasty too I bet :) n/t Tom Rinaldo Apr 2017 #37
As Jon Podesta says, you have to add the loquid slowly... brooklynite Apr 2017 #38
Thank you for this. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #39
precisely; this shouldn't even have to be stated. some people are either naive, uninformed, or TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #46
Not this again Amishman Apr 2017 #11
The Russians had guys with screwdrivers and jmg257 Apr 2017 #27
When switching 40,000 votes reverses the electioral college, your numberrs FAIL. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #31
Look, it's even easier than this..... Glitterati Apr 2017 #12
exactly. sarah FAILIN Apr 2017 #32
Yes, and in a micro targeted area or areas. nt LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #40
correct; this is an important point. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #47
If votes cannot be verified in recounts or physical evidence there is no fair vote. The Wielding Truth Apr 2017 #13
absolutely this. And the pretense of "concerted efforts were made everywhere else, but LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #17
not even in recounts; they must be counted by hand/eye the FIRST TIME. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #56
They tried. jeanmarc Apr 2017 #15
Prove it. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #18
Keep digging you'll get some real proof eventually jmg257 Apr 2017 #19
The article doesn't say what your OP declares. You can post this crap forever KittyWampus Apr 2017 #21
That article dates back to August and provides no proof that electronic voter fraud happened. briv1016 Apr 2017 #23
Why hack machines when it's so much easier to hack the data? crosinski Apr 2017 #25
Supposedly they're not connected to the net... jmg257 Apr 2017 #29
25 states use machines with the capability to connect to the internet, though it isn't clear pnwmom Apr 2017 #59
no doubt there are multiple ways the results could be manipulated. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #48
This thread proves 1 thing to me Alea Apr 2017 #26
If you don't KNOW that the Russians would have hacked the vote totals if they could have... TheDebbieDee Apr 2017 #30
Welcome to DU, Alea!! Do you mind if I ask how old you are? StevieM Apr 2017 #33
The "both sides" is a bullshit rw talking point. If you honestly think... NightWatcher Apr 2017 #34
wow Alea Apr 2017 #35
My reply wasn't about dems or reps Alea Apr 2017 #43
Times are tense, Alea. Sorry you got unfairly roughed up in this thread. StevieM Apr 2017 #57
Welcome Back! nt RandiFan1290 Apr 2017 #63
That poster didn't even come CLOSE to saying Hillary would've been just like Trump. KittyWampus Apr 2017 #44
That's false - I've seen multiple fake news stories from Liberal sources. Oneironaut Apr 2017 #54
You need to do more research. There is no reason to feel confidence that the Russians pnwmom Apr 2017 #58
thank you. bookmarked. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #62
this should be an issue... stillcool Apr 2017 #36
there *is* a reason; the PTB like the current fraudulent, hackable system. nt TheFrenchRazor Apr 2017 #49
Republicans let them do it Achilleaze Apr 2017 #50
The hackers admitted as much flamingdem Apr 2017 #51
I have felt this from the beginning cilla4progress Apr 2017 #52
So your claiming that "they" physically picked the locks of voting machines Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #60
That'd be "you're" for starters. LaydeeBug Apr 2017 #66
I agree, LB - and believe this will ultimately be revealed ElementaryPenguin Apr 2017 #64
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»**AND** they fucked with ...»Reply #58