Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: McConnell: Gorsuch Is Going To Be Confirmed One Way Or The Other [View all]cstanleytech
(28,458 posts)22. Go for it Mitch, you have held that threat over on the Democrats for the last time imo and
they need to tell you to shove it up your ass because if you do it then when control swings back we "will" remember it and you and your party are in for a rude awakening.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
illegitimate president; illegitimate judge - keeping it in the family - n/m
bagelsforbreakfast
Apr 2017
#7
Go for it Mitch, you have held that threat over on the Democrats for the last time imo and
cstanleytech
Apr 2017
#22
The Garland thing was a declaration of war by the GOP against the majority of America
Eliot Rosewater
Apr 2017
#27
How many votes does he need to change the rule (pass the nuclear option)? 50 & Pence? 60? 67? Other?
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#30
I meant, how many votes are needed to change the rule that kills the filibuster permanently?
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#34
Thank you! I read that third paragraph and it didn't register for me. My apologies for my idiocy.
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#39
So we need 3 Repubs to vote against the rule change, provided all 48 Dems vote against it.
LonePirate
Apr 2017
#41