Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
15. Sorry, it will blow itself apart before the chain reaction begins.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 12:29 AM
Apr 2017

Last edited Wed Apr 5, 2017, 01:47 AM - Edit history (1)

Without an initiator, you are not guaranteed a chain reaction because in the microsecond in which the super critical mass is assembled the chain reaction begins only if at least one neutron of the proper energy hits one of the nucleus. The super critical mass will blow itself apart faster than one could reasonably expect a neutron from a cosmic ray (for instance) to split one of the atoms.

Remember what Leo Szilard patented when he discovered the nuclear chain reaction. IF a single neutron splits a nucleus, AND IF at least two neutrons (of the appropriate energy) come out of that nucleus, THEN AND ONLY THEN a nuclear chain reaction will occur.

Without that first neutron at the precise point when the super critical mass is explosively assembled, the bomb fizzles. The chain reaction never gets going all the way before it blows itself apart. That's why all nuclear bombs have initiators.

Read the Rhodes book, cited above in another one of my posts. It's a great read. All is explained.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DPRK likely does not have a viable nuclear weapon. longship Apr 2017 #1
If there is war on the Korean Peninsula and nukes get used... roamer65 Apr 2017 #2
And I doubt that, too. longship Apr 2017 #5
It's likely that they don't have the proper hardware dalton99a Apr 2017 #4
Plus, the trigger design is kept damned close to the chest. longship Apr 2017 #6
You seem to think that a chain reaction is difficult. Thor_MN Apr 2017 #10
Nope! longship Apr 2017 #12
One Thing To Keep In Mind, Longship. . . . ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #18
Yes, the Little Boy gun was certain to work from theory. longship Apr 2017 #19
Maybe I've not kept up to date on DPRK tests. longship Apr 2017 #20
I Buy That ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #21
I with you on that. longship Apr 2017 #22
Yep. dalton99a Apr 2017 #11
I have not heard that they have a successful device. longship Apr 2017 #13
Last I heard they did detonate something equivalent to the "Fat Man" dalton99a Apr 2017 #14
Well, then they are further than I heard a couple years ago. longship Apr 2017 #16
Actually, making an atomic bomb is very easy. Thor_MN Apr 2017 #7
Sorry, it will blow itself apart before the chain reaction begins. longship Apr 2017 #15
Hell of a way to distract from Russia Gate. n/t dixiegrrrrl Apr 2017 #3
time's up jesskirablue42 Apr 2017 #8
Thats exactly what he is trying to do. milestogo Apr 2017 #9
Can't impeach a CIC ... GeorgeGist Apr 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House: 'The clock h...»Reply #15