Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

longship

(40,416 posts)
19. Yes, the Little Boy gun was certain to work from theory.
Wed Apr 5, 2017, 09:12 AM
Apr 2017

But it still had an initiator in two parts, one on the end of the bullet part and one inside the target. When bullet hits the target, at the instant of assembly, the initiator parts collide to provide a slow neutron or two to start the chain reaction. Without that element, the assembly blows itself apart before a chain reaction can start and the bomb is a fizzle. It does not go off (with the exception of the high explosives used to fast assemble the bullet with the target).

In the Fat Man the initiator was at the center of the plutonium implosion core. It gets crushed by the imploding core to provide the necessary slow neutrons at the precise instant of assembly. Again, without the initiator, the core just blows apart before it detonates.

No initiator. No nuclear detonation.

It really is simple.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

DPRK likely does not have a viable nuclear weapon. longship Apr 2017 #1
If there is war on the Korean Peninsula and nukes get used... roamer65 Apr 2017 #2
And I doubt that, too. longship Apr 2017 #5
It's likely that they don't have the proper hardware dalton99a Apr 2017 #4
Plus, the trigger design is kept damned close to the chest. longship Apr 2017 #6
You seem to think that a chain reaction is difficult. Thor_MN Apr 2017 #10
Nope! longship Apr 2017 #12
One Thing To Keep In Mind, Longship. . . . ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #18
Yes, the Little Boy gun was certain to work from theory. longship Apr 2017 #19
Maybe I've not kept up to date on DPRK tests. longship Apr 2017 #20
I Buy That ProfessorGAC Apr 2017 #21
I with you on that. longship Apr 2017 #22
Yep. dalton99a Apr 2017 #11
I have not heard that they have a successful device. longship Apr 2017 #13
Last I heard they did detonate something equivalent to the "Fat Man" dalton99a Apr 2017 #14
Well, then they are further than I heard a couple years ago. longship Apr 2017 #16
Actually, making an atomic bomb is very easy. Thor_MN Apr 2017 #7
Sorry, it will blow itself apart before the chain reaction begins. longship Apr 2017 #15
Hell of a way to distract from Russia Gate. n/t dixiegrrrrl Apr 2017 #3
time's up jesskirablue42 Apr 2017 #8
Thats exactly what he is trying to do. milestogo Apr 2017 #9
Can't impeach a CIC ... GeorgeGist Apr 2017 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House: 'The clock h...»Reply #19