Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Maher's panel republicans saying that we should have used the filibuster for the next justice [View all]
because now they can appoint one even further right.
1. How do you get further right than Gorsuch?
2. What would've stopped them from doing that anyways? The filibuster? Why should it? They would've nuked it then too.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
37 replies, 7770 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Maher's panel republicans saying that we should have used the filibuster for the next justice [View all]
Jonny Appleseed
Apr 2017
OP
I have a better idea, let's take back Congress in 2018 and the WH in 2020, and tell the republicans
still_one
Apr 2017
#1
Do you really expect anything other than the default "kumbaya let's reach across the aisle"
Jonny Appleseed
Apr 2017
#8
ruth bader ginsburg, and every Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats were no
still_one
Apr 2017
#15
That we'll push through a democratic agenda instead of watering it down for republicans
Jonny Appleseed
Apr 2017
#17
That is what I thought the OP was about, and why the republicans eliminated the filibuster
still_one
Apr 2017
#21
There's a school of thought a deal could have been made with three or four repig moderates.
Hassin Bin Sober
Apr 2017
#3
that was the school of thought. Who on that side of the aisle would you trust not to cave
JCanete
Apr 2017
#5
the question is, when the next hard right wing justice is up for nomination, why wouldn't
JCanete
Apr 2017
#31
Yes it would be the word of the 3 Republicans. It wouldnt only be their word though
mr_liberal
Apr 2017
#32
No sense in delaying it. A red flag should go up if repugs are saying we should've waited
brush
Apr 2017
#10
They just want to go back now to the way it was so Dems can't use it if they take
shraby
Apr 2017
#13
Well, when the filibuster was done away with for presidential appointments
customerserviceguy
Apr 2017
#28