Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,311 posts)
3. There's a school of thought a deal could have been made with three or four repig moderates.
Sat Apr 8, 2017, 01:05 AM
Apr 2017

It would only take a handful of Democrats and a handful of repigs to make a coalition.

Senators are famous for their "gang of six" or "gang of twelve" grandstanding.

The deal would be, allow Gorsuch now and we will block a rule change next time.

It's easier to hold a couple senators on either side to a deal than the whole party. Things are so divided that's all you have to do.

I learned this on du the other day. Forget who schooled me.

It may have made sense. They were getting Gorsuch one way or another. Now we are completely exposed until at least 2019 if something happens to one of our very liberal Justices. Longer if we don't take the Senate.

The way we did it will only pay off if .. 1.) nobody on our side retires or dies in the next 2 years. 2.) we have to take back the Senate just to be able to block any or all nominations by trump -- this would probably involve leaving seat(s) open.

Extra credit if we get Presidency next time with a dem Senate. Then we get the last laugh.

Ruth Bader Ginsberg has/had pancreatic cancer and by statistics should be dead. On the plus side, she does a bunch of push-ups and planks every day -- she'll probably outlive me.

I have a better idea, let's take back Congress in 2018 and the WH in 2020, and tell the republicans still_one Apr 2017 #1
Do you really expect anything other than the default "kumbaya let's reach across the aisle" Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #8
yeah... that shit really pisses me off n/t orleans Apr 2017 #12
ruth bader ginsburg, and every Supreme Court justices appointed by Democrats were no still_one Apr 2017 #15
That we'll push through a democratic agenda instead of watering it down for republicans Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #17
That was my point still_one Apr 2017 #19
I'm not talking about the supreme court specifically though. Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #20
That is what I thought the OP was about, and why the republicans eliminated the filibuster still_one Apr 2017 #21
Yes but not what the thread you're replying in is about Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #22
My subthread was addressing the OP's presentation of a guest on Maher's show still_one Apr 2017 #25
*Republicans*. Everything they say on TV is strategic sharedvalues Apr 2017 #2
Evan McCullen was being pretty genuine Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #7
Fair, but I think he has the legislative strategy way wrong. sharedvalues Apr 2017 #11
There's a school of thought a deal could have been made with three or four repig moderates. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2017 #3
that was the school of thought. Who on that side of the aisle would you trust not to cave JCanete Apr 2017 #5
I don't know. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2017 #9
McCain would have made the deal because it would have also allowed mr_liberal Apr 2017 #29
the question is, when the next hard right wing justice is up for nomination, why wouldn't JCanete Apr 2017 #31
Yes it would be the word of the 3 Republicans. It wouldnt only be their word though mr_liberal Apr 2017 #32
Oh I see what you're asking now. mr_liberal Apr 2017 #33
No way. That would be enabling the corrupt. sharedvalues Apr 2017 #6
I don't disagree. I'm ok with what happened. Hassin Bin Sober Apr 2017 #14
No sense in delaying it. A red flag should go up if repugs are saying we should've waited brush Apr 2017 #10
that nonsense should have been slapped down. Maher and Lieu let it slide. JCanete Apr 2017 #4
They just want to go back now to the way it was so Dems can't use it if they take shraby Apr 2017 #13
For a long time, Republicans have chosen their nominee and stuck with him. kentuck Apr 2017 #16
Agreed, the Republicans have been acting like a racketeering organization Warpy Apr 2017 #18
Check it out. They're not acting. dchill Apr 2017 #24
"...now they can appoint one even further right. " dchill Apr 2017 #23
Well, when the filibuster was done away with for presidential appointments customerserviceguy Apr 2017 #28
Theyre right, Democrats should have made a deal... mr_liberal Apr 2017 #26
Make that fifty votes to confirm the next Justice customerserviceguy Apr 2017 #30
Number one: The President, not they, do the nominating Freethinker65 Apr 2017 #27
They did the correct thing by filibustering... MaeScott Apr 2017 #34
makes sense mnmoderatedem Apr 2017 #35
Nothing would have stopped them from doing it anyways. Vinca Apr 2017 #36
See? It's Democrats fault that Gorsuch got appointed because rurallib Apr 2017 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Maher's panel republicans...»Reply #3