Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: For those against the attack, what should have been done after the chemical attacks? [View all]jmg257
(11,996 posts)59. I'm with Her - take out their airforce and air fields. Although MUCH easier said than done
what with Russia air assets all over the place.
Concentrated missile strikes is small small 'reasoned' response, as a taste of what could be, without putting Americans in harm's way.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
For those against the attack, what should have been done after the chemical attacks? [View all]
Rustyeye77
Apr 2017
OP
First, find out who was responsible with certainty. This is what trump recommended.
L. Coyote
Apr 2017
#62
Since his family doesn't live there, I was hoping they'd blow up his huge, tacky presidential palace
OregonBlue
Apr 2017
#107
Neither is creating a lot of potholes next to an airstrip in a Kabuki dance with Putin
Squinch
Apr 2017
#81
I agree. Although it needed a response, this bombing 'show' was not it. nt
WePurrsevere
Apr 2017
#64
In a perfect world with intelligent leaders this is the appropriate course of action
randr
Apr 2017
#65
EXACTLY. ANSWERED. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can fall for this attack -- no refugees
anneboleyn
Apr 2017
#28
I don't think you can make the case for these strikes being unconstitutional.
Act_of_Reparation
Apr 2017
#24
And fuck Trump's rejection of geothermal energy in federal facilities, while we're at it.
Orrex
Apr 2017
#98
The executive branch should have consulted with Congress, whether it was required by the
still_one
Apr 2017
#56
Something smart and patriotic? Warning the Russians and Syrians ahead of time wasn't that
uponit7771
Apr 2017
#13
Nothing. If he wasn't willing to let them in the country when they were alive...
WoonTars
Apr 2017
#17
While that would have been a much more effective message, the problem with that is...
stevenleser
Apr 2017
#91
Why shoot missiles at us and not allow any refugees into their country! Just like Trump!
anneboleyn
Apr 2017
#29
Something other than this Lone Ranger strike on one airfield. This was a show attack
delisen
Apr 2017
#31
Is there actually proof who and what and why about this chemical attack?
The_Casual_Observer
Apr 2017
#33
Well, I know attacking an empty airbase with Putin and Assad's prior knowledge....
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2017
#35
An attack that took out the air force and/or did lasting harm to their ability to use their
Demsrule86
Apr 2017
#45
If we were going to launch missiles, the base should have been left inoperable.
Blue_true
Apr 2017
#52
I'm with Her - take out their airforce and air fields. Although MUCH easier said than done
jmg257
Apr 2017
#59
the rebels had chemical weapons on the ground, which is possible since they were the ones
yurbud
Apr 2017
#92
stop our allies from funding beheading "rebels," and ask our politicians what it is
yurbud
Apr 2017
#108