Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

rah rah rah Blues Heron Apr 2017 #1
First, find out who was responsible with certainty. This is what trump recommended. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #62
Since his family doesn't live there, I was hoping they'd blow up his huge, tacky presidential palace OregonBlue Apr 2017 #107
There are no good options when it comes to Syria. nycbos Apr 2017 #2
THIS Cosmocat Apr 2017 #20
When President Obama considered it treestar Apr 2017 #3
Try out ones molling trolling skills on a left wing website? Littlered9560 Apr 2017 #4
That's really insulting. Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #14
WHAT'S THE LEGAL BASIS FOR THE ATTACK??? eniwetok Apr 2017 #79
Try this ... Langkous Apr 2017 #5
Good article. underpants Apr 2017 #6
Those measures are helpful but they're not going to get at a solution Yavin4 Apr 2017 #30
Neither is creating a lot of potholes next to an airstrip in a Kabuki dance with Putin Squinch Apr 2017 #81
more of the same meaningless bullshit. frankieallen Apr 2017 #93
I doubt tRump's inneffectual strike will stop anything either. That Guy 888 Apr 2017 #97
Well, Obama's response to the last one was pretty effective Recursion Apr 2017 #7
The Trump team was stupid LeftInTX Apr 2017 #42
take the complaint to the U.N. Security Council bigtree Apr 2017 #8
That would be the right answer. Voltaire2 Apr 2017 #15
This would have been a much, much better and more sane approach. old guy Apr 2017 #19
Agreed, kacekwl Apr 2017 #23
Bingo! workinclasszero Apr 2017 #38
I agree. Although it needed a response, this bombing 'show' was not it. nt WePurrsevere Apr 2017 #64
In a perfect world with intelligent leaders this is the appropriate course of action randr Apr 2017 #65
Exactly. This is an international problem. Tatiana Apr 2017 #73
it's notable that they didn't try bigtree Apr 2017 #78
You go to the UN, and you present the evidence you have. Kentonio Apr 2017 #100
question DonCoquixote Apr 2017 #90
Investigate who is responsible first. L. Coyote Apr 2017 #9
If you're willing to learn nini Apr 2017 #10
EXACTLY. ANSWERED. Honestly, I don't know how anyone can fall for this attack -- no refugees anneboleyn Apr 2017 #28
I am stunned at otherwise logical people falling for this on facebook nini Apr 2017 #36
There aren't any good options leftynyc Apr 2017 #11
Syria is full of Russians now! Jim Beard Apr 2017 #96
Follow the Constitution! Johnny2X2X Apr 2017 #12
I don't think you can make the case for these strikes being unconstitutional. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #24
Yes we can TXCritter Apr 2017 #26
I think you mean 50 USC 1541(c) Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #39
And fuck Trump's rejection of geothermal energy in federal facilities, while we're at it. Orrex Apr 2017 #98
Damn skippy. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2017 #99
Honestly, I never would have spotted it if not for your post pointing it out Orrex Apr 2017 #101
The executive branch should have consulted with Congress, whether it was required by the still_one Apr 2017 #56
Thank you. At the minumum that should have been done still_one Apr 2017 #55
Something smart and patriotic? Warning the Russians and Syrians ahead of time wasn't that uponit7771 Apr 2017 #13
What Obama did - nothing. AngryAmish Apr 2017 #16
Actually, President Obama did more than nothing -- IndianaDave Apr 2017 #106
Nothing. If he wasn't willing to let them in the country when they were alive... WoonTars Apr 2017 #17
A strike on Syrian AF C3 sarisataka Apr 2017 #18
While that would have been a much more effective message, the problem with that is... stevenleser Apr 2017 #91
Trump said Syria is not our concern sarah FAILIN Apr 2017 #21
Since when was it okay for us to strike a sovereign nation? WhiteTara Apr 2017 #22
if Trump gassed us... stillcool Apr 2017 #25
Why shoot missiles at us and not allow any refugees into their country! Just like Trump! anneboleyn Apr 2017 #29
Assassinate Assad Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #27
That was my thought. tavernier Apr 2017 #60
Something other than this Lone Ranger strike on one airfield. This was a show attack delisen Apr 2017 #31
Well first thing, if you are going to call in an air strike Canoe52 Apr 2017 #32
I definitely agree. Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #44
Is there actually proof who and what and why about this chemical attack? The_Casual_Observer Apr 2017 #33
It played well with the coffee shop crowd this morning. doc03 Apr 2017 #34
Well, I know attacking an empty airbase with Putin and Assad's prior knowledge.... Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2017 #35
Kill! Kill! Kill! Iggo Apr 2017 #37
I'm not quite sure I know how to feel about the strike yet Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2017 #40
Good questions - on principle I've no problem with intervention. JHan Apr 2017 #41
It probably would have helped to keep Russia out of the loop .. ananda Apr 2017 #43
An attack that took out the air force and/or did lasting harm to their ability to use their Demsrule86 Apr 2017 #45
Ignore it. AngryAmish Apr 2017 #46
Immediately hire Barack Obama to take charge. randome Apr 2017 #47
Last I heard, he was in Tahiti. cwydro Apr 2017 #49
Laughing one moment, crying the next, I'd bet. randome Apr 2017 #50
Learn the law malaise Apr 2017 #48
Let's ask Rep. Michael Burgess ck4829 Apr 2017 #51
If we were going to launch missiles, the base should have been left inoperable. Blue_true Apr 2017 #52
Without a doubt they should have gone to Congress and the UN still_one Apr 2017 #53
Notify congress, not Putin. C_U_L8R Apr 2017 #54
If only 45 had considered Self-immolation. Sigh. eom littlemissmartypants Apr 2017 #57
Are you in favor of the attack? oberliner Apr 2017 #58
I don't know how I feel. Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #66
Oberliner Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #68
What does this post mean? oberliner Apr 2017 #69
C'mon.... You don't know what Zyclon /Zyklon B is ? Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #70
I don't know what writing my screen name and "Zyclon B" mean as a post oberliner Apr 2017 #76
Ok Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #84
When you write that you want the world to take immediate action oberliner Apr 2017 #86
I keep answering your questions. Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #87
Thanks for the response oberliner Apr 2017 #88
You're not even trying to hide it, are you? Squinch Apr 2017 #82
I'm with Her - take out their airforce and air fields. Although MUCH easier said than done jmg257 Apr 2017 #59
I think the attack was an appropriate military response given the gas attack randr Apr 2017 #61
Immediately increase sanctions against russia. Mc Mike Apr 2017 #63
I don't think you ignore atrocities like that kcr Apr 2017 #67
Nothing specifically in response to that incident. David__77 Apr 2017 #71
An enforced no fly zone would have been much better Lee-Lee Apr 2017 #72
Investigate to figure out for sure who was responsible for it. nt tblue37 Apr 2017 #74
Nothing. Odoreida Apr 2017 #75
Agree mvd Apr 2017 #77
Well, let's see... what has WORKED in the past? A few things: Squinch Apr 2017 #80
Humanitarian aid. panader0 Apr 2017 #83
How do you know for sure Syria used chemical weapons? yurbud Apr 2017 #85
A rebel held area was attacked from the air oberliner Apr 2017 #89
the rebels had chemical weapons on the ground, which is possible since they were the ones yurbud Apr 2017 #92
OK oberliner Apr 2017 #94
an airstrike hits munitions and they explode yurbud Apr 2017 #95
All of the above were possibilities Warpy Apr 2017 #102
Something meaningful... except lies Apr 2017 #103
Watched and waited until they were certain... Historic NY Apr 2017 #104
Not a damn thing! nikibatts Apr 2017 #105
stop our allies from funding beheading "rebels," and ask our politicians what it is yurbud Apr 2017 #108
While awful- how many countless JCMach1 Apr 2017 #109
So we do nothing? Rustyeye77 Apr 2017 #110
Didn't say that- just pointing JCMach1 Apr 2017 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For those against the att...»Reply #69