Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Should Tulsi Gabbard Leave Congress? MSNBC Discussion Now 9:53 pacific [View all]Vinca
(53,725 posts)10. I would give a shit about Tulsi if the media covered the rather obvious point of the missiles
in the first place. It had nothing to do with beautiful babies or gas attacks and everything to do with distraction. Heard much about Russia the past few days?? The missiles hit an airfield and didn't even disable it. The planes had been removed from the hangars before the hangars were hit. People worry about Tulsi cozying up to Assad, but it would appear the entire attack plan was laid out for him before it happened giving him enough time to prepare. I'm betting Pootie got on the horn and told Assad what he was going to let happen for the good of the cause. Next thing you know a CNN host is slobbering all over Trump calling him "presidential." A happy Trump is an easier tool to work with.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I would give a shit about Tulsi if the media covered the rather obvious point of the missiles
Vinca
Apr 2017
#10
This is a safe Democratic seat that should be occupied by someone who helps the Democratic party
Gothmog
Apr 2017
#99
"...these attacks on Gabbard"? That's a rather ambiguous way of putting it. Just curious...
Hekate
Apr 2017
#24
haha...now we can multi-task. Look, I'm going to look into Gabbard, I don't know enough about
JCanete
Apr 2017
#104
totally, but I think the people asking here were actually pointing out that double standard they
JCanete
Apr 2017
#109
Well, this is a nice illustration of the difference between bashing and criticism.
betsuni
Apr 2017
#62
Her point was that US interventionist regime change wars cause vastly more suffering.
Pablorama
Apr 2017
#27
Given that she's working with that administration and is a favorite among them
synergie
Apr 2017
#46
The two most powerful factions in Syria, after Assad, are Isis and Al Qaeda
killbotfactory
Apr 2017
#30
get her a job in trump administration, then we can get a real progressive in Hawaii again nt
msongs
Apr 2017
#54
Probably Assad, but since this risks drawing us directly into the conflict...
killbotfactory
Apr 2017
#58
What specifically leads you to allege the evidence is merely circumstantial?
LanternWaste
Apr 2017
#95
She hasn't jumped on Trumps bandwagon like all the Democrats did with GW Bush's
Jim Beard
Apr 2017
#96