Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TheBlackAdder

(29,981 posts)
32. That's an understatement! It fucking exists.
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 02:32 PM
Apr 2017

.


I took a Rutgers-Eagleton Woman and Politics course, and misogyny is rampant.

Trump took a majority of Evangelicals, moreso than the past 5 presidential election cycles. Unlike Obama, who fostered an early and strong outreach to the 43 Million Evangelicals, HRC refused to return calls from various Evangelical magazines and newspapers, and refused contact with various Evangelical leaders. Even so, this does not explain Trump's higher-than-normal vote totals.


While the Christian Right talks a game (not a good one) about having women leaders, the truth is, there is deep-seated resentment to women in power. The following link has enormous information on this topic, as the country's sole university research facility that specializes in Women and Politics.

http://www.cawp.rutgers.edu/


Spend a day there and you will be surprised at what you find.


(Note: Now I know I'll get jumped on for mentioning HRC's weak Evangelical outreach program, which was started late in the game, but that's the facts. Search online, because there is a Christian Left that expressed grave concerns that she ignored them. Many of those areas are where the Dems underperformed this past cycle, especially in PA. Her “The unborn person doesn ’t have constitutional rights." comment hurt her. Christianity Today repeatedly reached out to her and was rebuffed. Ruth Graham (Slate Magazine) has a powerful article. Michael Wear, Obama’s 2012 Faith Outreach Director said, "simple difference between Obama 's two presidential campaigns and Clinton's 2016 campaign is that Obama asked for the votes of white evangelicals and Clinton did not." Liberal Evangelical leader, Ron Sider a Democrat and the founder of Evangelicals for Social Action said, "I find it dumhfounding and incredibly stupid that the Democratic Party and her campaign didn 't reach out to try to engage a segment of the white evangelical community. Apparently they thought they could win without us." There's a bunch more. )


.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Might? Wounded Bear Apr 2017 #1
First words out of my mouth were Might????. Yup. Guilded Lilly Apr 2017 #16
Oh God. DK504 Apr 2017 #25
Yep. Might?????? calimary Apr 2017 #28
Great minds! BlueMTexpat Apr 2017 #30
I saw it PatSeg Apr 2017 #2
Even obvious things need evidence mythology Apr 2017 #3
This might be the biggest no shit ever. nycbos Apr 2017 #4
it's amazing that some people would even dispute this. unblock Apr 2017 #5
No fucking "might" about it. JTFrog Apr 2017 #6
Oversensitive aboutbigotry? What the ever loving fuck? Do some still think that bigotry bettyellen Apr 2017 #14
Yes. Because calling attention to bigotry is worse than bigotry itself. JTFrog Apr 2017 #24
Mind blowing brer cat Apr 2017 #42
share me link pretty please. JHan Apr 2017 #20
Additional research also suggests that water is wet and grass is green. Jonny Appleseed Apr 2017 #7
Since the election I have talked with many who voted for trump and was so caroldansen Apr 2017 #8
We got a lot of that right here at DU. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #10
John Lennon and Yoko Ono said it in 1972... Cattledog Apr 2017 #9
No doubt at all about it. MineralMan Apr 2017 #11
Do we really need research to prove that misogyny ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #12
Unfortunately many people "demand" we prove it. I'm sick of talking to them. bettyellen Apr 2017 #15
Once it is proven, then what? ProudLib72 Apr 2017 #18
I think with non-voters you can open a door and explore how their knee jerk expectations can cause bettyellen Apr 2017 #21
Of course she is right. lunamagica Apr 2017 #13
"Voters care whether their female politicians are likable, an attribute that is not something... bettyellen Apr 2017 #17
Politicians and their campaigns definitely know this. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #22
and imagine for a second she had said he was well spoken enough dsc Apr 2017 #39
As my beloved Dad used to say "no bout a doubt it". Guilded Lilly Apr 2017 #19
yes it was a factor, like racism. but the real question certainot Apr 2017 #23
K & R JHan Apr 2017 #26
I am certain of it. Ilsa Apr 2017 #27
For those that disagree.... mzteaze Apr 2017 #29
Great point and you're right - WJC wasn't asked for a cookie recipe FakeNoose Apr 2017 #33
To be filed in the "No Shit Sherlock" file. n/t Lil Missy Apr 2017 #31
That's an understatement! It fucking exists. TheBlackAdder Apr 2017 #32
Those white evangelicals have some soul searching to do. WomenRising2017 Apr 2017 #36
Michelle Backman couldn't get evangelicals to vote for her dsc Apr 2017 #40
Ah, yeah anglesphere Apr 2017 #34
She won the popular vote by almost 3 million... Lokilooney Apr 2017 #35
By 3,000,000 in California. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #37
Yes in states like Wisconsin and Michigan Lokilooney Apr 2017 #49
There are a lot of women out there who bought into "Leave it to Beaver" Warpy Apr 2017 #38
I know women who think that a woman shouldn't be president Kaleva Apr 2017 #41
The "might" is journalistic idiocy. brer cat Apr 2017 #43
"Might" seems to be catching people off guard. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #44
DUH! Bettie Apr 2017 #45
Any notion of how many votes she got cause she was a woman vs. how many she lost? jmg257 Apr 2017 #46
We have a word - misogyny. yallerdawg Apr 2017 #47
She received 66 million votes based on the fact that she was the WomenRising2017 Apr 2017 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton says miso...»Reply #32